this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
183 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59081 readers
3241 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Not polluting where we live would also work too, but fuck that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No trees have a far bigger impact than reducing pollution. They draw moisture out of deep under ground and react with sunlight, evaporating the water which significantly cools the air down. On top of that it also creates shade. Both, combined, have a massive local impact on the climate - it's orders of magnitude more powerful than all the world's carbon emissions (if you are near the tree, anyway).

If you compare the air temperature in a city to surrounding countryside full of trees it is always significantly hotter and drier in the city. That's not pollution, it's a lack of trees.

Trees also directly release trace amounts of "sesquiterpenes" into the air which causes water to condense... in other words trees directly increase the number of clouds and directly increase rainfall. So even though they're pulling water out of the ground they also increase the amount of water in the ground.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not really an either/or situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Industry is lazy and demands a profit. We could absolutely have advanced technology, a robust industry, and a thriving planet, but rich people need to make as much money as fast as possible.

We don't even need to stop polluting , just stop polluting at the levels we do.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Let’s not pollute anywhere 😎

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Nah let’s pollute Pluto, we could even call it Polluto as we laugh at its lack of planetary status.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Hahahahahahaha you're a fucking genius friend

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This sounds like it could be a Futurama plot point, like the trash asteroid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

You cannot really unpollute albedo, this is a built environment issue.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Trees doesn’t rhyme with Celsius.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That image is exemplary of what we call a "Zementwüste", a cement desert.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yes and it can be fixed.