this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
236 points (96.1% liked)

linuxmemes

20473 readers
1051 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't wait to have to download a crack for my browser so a website thinks that my browser is using wei and no-adblock.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Just use Firefox. I don't understand why people are so hell-bent on using a Chromium-based browser.

EDIT: I see now that I was grossly misinformed on the issue. Thanks for the replies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

A few of us sitting and using Firefox while Google is suggesting being able to control what computer you use, what software is installed, what plugins you are allowed to have?

This is a very big threat not solved by using Firefox.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Right. I mean there's always going to be a way. Your open source browser can run a spoof of an "official" browser, present itself as a valid user, load the page with all the ads and tracking in a sandbox in between, strip all of it out and serve you the actual content.

Or maybe people will eventually be fed up and we'll start our own internet completely out of corporate control.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Your open source browser can run a spoof of an “official” browser

Not if the server requires the digital signature of a challenge to be produced by a key whose certificate is signed by a "trusted" third party, said third party only providing that key at runtime, if your browser can also provide the same kind of authorization from the OS, itself being only able to produce it if it can safely determine that it's running on completely locked-down hardware AND having online-activated DRM tells him he can provide such key; the hardware itself requiring constant online connexion to ensure it's "authorized", and including yet another layer of keys in hardware.

There's been progress toward this kind of things. At every step, people warning about the risks are seen as lunatics. SecureBoot preventing booting a custom kernel? No problem, microsoft will sign your keys. TPM not delivering keys to non-trusted kernels? No problem, just don't use it (and don't get the keys, obviously). UEFI requiring digital signature to be flashed? It's for your safety, but we won't give you the keys or it would defeat the purpose. Embedded CPU inside your CPU running opaque code on every operation you do? Trust me bro, there's no problem here.

Sure, opensource (or even just open at this point) alternative will most likely remain available as a niche, but once all major services that people want requires such a chain of control, the vast majority of people will gladly flock to locked-down system. Heck, it's already happening. Nowadays I can't even log into my bank website without a trusted iOS or Android device. The "free, open" alternative will be rare, expensive, and only work for people that cares. Which is not too much sadly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Reject modernity, return to Gemini

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the thing to do here, when web sites start enforcing this, is to swamp them with support requests. Don't write a screed or manifesto with ethical or technical reasons why this is wrong. Pretend to be a non-technically-inclined user and tell them you've spent hours trying to get it to work and your browser keeps throwing up errors you don't understand. They will ignore the principles, but if they think the technology is "too hard" for their "dumb users," that might carry more weight.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't think this will work. If companies can get away of slapping us by doing "please use Google Chrome or other Chromium-based browsers" just because Google implements the most privacy-last feature ever, then they will get away with it this time, again.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I literally can't log into the Amtrak Android app unless I have Chrome installed. It strictly relies on Chrome custom tabs. Other browsers that support custom tabs don't work.

I cannot imagine any reason for this except sheer ineptitude.

Guess what Amtrak support told me when I reported this as a bug?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Prolly that it's a feature?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They told you to take a hike instead of a train

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The free internet is bad for Google.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay I wasn't expecting to be attacked like that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah, it's a great line. Herbert was a genius and it's easy to forget that, at many levels, the Dune series is a political science treatise.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Secutity is not priotity.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is what people are trying to do with the Internet. It was never going to be capable of replacing every facet of society the way these corporations seem to have envisioned things. To paraphrase Serial Experiments Lain: The wired should support the real world, not replace it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not a WEB browser, that's a Googleverse browser.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Also sounds like you're describing a Chromebook. Which, incidentally, schools seem to be abandoning because of the fact that they become useless on a predetermined date.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

where linux

i know google sucks but still

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They’re adding DRM? In what way?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Basically by allowing websites to refuse to load unless the browser the operating system running the browser promises that the user isn't allowed to know what the computer is doing. And Google super duper promises this won't be used for evil.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/07/googles-web-integrity-api-sounds-like-drm-for-the-web/

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can read a little about it here

I also encourage you to look at the GitHub...be warned that there are some quite angry folks on there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So what can we do? Egg their headquarters? Because so far our useless politicians haven't passed bills to fight this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's already too late. Google has a monoton the browser market. Do you think your regular normie would continue to use Firefox if Netflix, Instagram, TokTok etc. don't work anymore?

There is nothing we can do. The internet of old is already lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It'd help if the government wasn't run by a bunch of ancient humans that were there when cavemen would draw on cave walls. The government has shown time and time again they don't understand tech but always try to act like they do. Take that tiktok case for example. They made themselves look like idiots to the USA. Pathetic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think the moment for me was when they had Mark Zuckerberg himself, testify to Congress.

They didn't "grill him" as media would've liked to have you believe. The guy danced around all of Congress because they themselves didn't know a damn thing about what he was saying. Of course he wasn't penalized and got off scot-free.

Just like every other tech company. The FTC, has no teeth. The FCC, has no teeth. Congress, has no brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Use forks or other browsers than chrome.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

More DRM. Browsers already support DRM schemes for media playback.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not overly worried - the EU anticompetition laws will swat this down on this side of the atlantic - but not sure about the US

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The US will welcome it with open arms. Because of course, America.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They already did it with site doing SEO for Google's algorithmic dark patterns.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That was the plan all along.

load more comments
view more: next ›