this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

MovieSnob

2 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss, debate, and celebrate the history of cinema, emphasis on—but not exclusively—the groundbreaking, avant garde and experimental, with a healthy dose of irreverence instead of the usual navel-gazing that usually surrounds cineastic appreciation.


Community Rules

  1. "All is fair in love and war" but keep it witty or, at minimum, intelligent. If you can't do either, keep walking. This community's administrators will not abide simpletons nor bullies.

  2. "Franchise picture" fans and similar ilk, be forewarned: you are open game to be verbally flayed in this public square. Did you not see the name of this community?

  3. There ~~may~~ will be occasionally adult subject matter (NSFW)—such is the nature of the beast. While it is not the scope of this community to purvey nor condone extreme or gratuitous sex or violence, neither subjects are necessarily condemned when in context with the subject matter at hand. It is also not the scope of this community to discuss only adult themes; how else could one discuss Fleming's The Wizard of Oz (1939) or Donen/Kelly's Singing In The Rain (1952)?

  • It is suggested you do not subscribe if you are highly sensitive to either subjects.

  • It is strongly suggested that authors of submitted posts mark NSFW content as such. Err on the side of doubt.

  1. All opinions expressed are strictly of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the moderators of this community nor the administrators of this instance (lemmy.film).

Logrolling

icon [email protected]

icon [email protected]

icon [email protected]

icon [email protected]


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We are inundated by so many external moving images, advertising unfortunately being the most pervasive, that it is near impossible to know on what to spend 90 minutes of your limited time in this plane of existence. In our quest to enrich of your cinematic culture(!), this is the first of an ongoing series of viewing (minimum) the first ten minutes of any given film and judging if it's worth watching any further. Hit or Miss in 10 minutes. Red pill or blue pill, swipe right or left. You are all cordially invited to participate.


Today's film is Alta Vista (2020), written and directed by Joe Clarke, starring Joe Clarke, Stacey Scowley, Tanika 'Tea' Vickers. Clarke wins today's Marv Newland Triple Crown Award.

Ten minute analysis (real time: 00:15:30)
Summary: protagonist sad sack Joe's father has passed away. He needs a fresh outlook in life and packs in his Iowan reefer fog to pursue his dream as a filmmaker in Hollywood…or maybe just to sample the drugs out there.

  • The opening credits—yes, the opening credits—are just so wrong. They are just too…friendly for the immediate feel of the movie[^note1]. Most likely done by someone who just didn't care.
  • Cameraperson either suffers from Parkinson's or is drinking their breakfast. Either that or the post artist is heavy handed in his AE Wiggle settings.
  • Blade Runner Memorial Award: Narration. Worse yet, mumbled narration. Even worse, narration tries to cover up for flabby storytelling. Alibaba USB Audio Award: There is a clear-cut difference in audio quality between the narration and the diegetic audio.
  • Stiff acting.
  • Continuity: where was the sister, who is introduced in the next scene, at the funeral? No reason is even intimated.

And our hero Joe is on the road to Hollywood. Do I care? Honestly, no. Joe, in any of his roles as director nor screenwriter nor actor, hasn't given me one reason to. In fifteen minutes this film doesn't know what it wants to be. Next!

Do you think I missed an undiscovered cinematic gem? You tell me; that's what the comments are for!

[^note1]: From the cool blue color correction and (terrible) noir-ish narration of its opening minutes, the film presents itself as a crime drama/mystery…but it's not…or is it?…or maybe it's a comedy? It just doesn't know.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here