this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
-4 points (0.0% liked)

Conservative

367 readers
26 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (11 children)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/

I'm sure breitbart, historically known for lying out the ass isn't at all misrepresenting the situation. Can you use an actual source?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Actually...yeah, I suspect Breitbart is lying out of its ass again.

Searching for an alternative is impossible. Every instance on Google references the Breitbart link. Alternative don't exist to find.

Believing that this is true is like listening to Trump say "We're gonna walk down to the Capitol" and believing you're gonna pal around with the president in the halls of Democracy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a source saying the situation is different?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The burden of proof isn't on me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is actually. The source is cited, you would then provide a countersource if you disagree. You just don't scream, I don't like your cite! That isn't how you have a discussion or debate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (41 children)

Funny that you have no problem using a White Nationalist site as a source.

Idk though, maybe more news sites could use a "black crime" tag.

Gee, wonder why people think y'all are Nazis?

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›