this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1430 readers
824 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Curious to see how that will work out

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I am curious to see who actually integrates into this. Typically those not using WhatsApp do so on purpose as they don’t want to feed the Facebook machine and choose more privacy focused applications (e.g. Signal)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Well, it's still useful to be able to contact someone who's exclusive reachable via WhatsApp. Better than having to install WhatsApp or leave it installed, just in case.

[–] SilverShark 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would love to see it. Being able to talk with someone over Whatsapp but not actually having it installed.

I've always been surprised with the success of Whatsapp. The fact that it's tied to a phone number and not an email always seemed like an odd choice to me. I feel that a phone number is much more volatile since people change phone numbers a bit frequently, and will then not transfer their old chats to a new number and lose contacts as a result.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As I understand it, the phone requirement is an attempt to limit spam/bots.

Their success is really filling the void of an extremely outdated standard solution of sms/mms that cannot handle a long message without breaking it apart, yet alone any type of media.

It also came at a time when companies were still charging per sms/mms message, meanwhile connecting to wifi meant free and unlimited messaging, without size issues and your media turning into potatoes

[–] SilverShark 1 points 9 months ago

That way to limit is quite interesting. Never though about that!

[–] Blaze 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was there first, that's mostly it.

[–] SilverShark 2 points 9 months ago

And as a replacement for SMS.