this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
132 points (97.1% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2820 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A "cancer-killing pill" has appeared to "annihilate" solid tumours in early research - leaving healthy cells unaffected.

Professor Linda Malkas, who has been developing the drug, explained: "PCNA is like a major airline terminal hub containing multiple plane gates.

"Our cancer-killing pill is like a snowstorm that closes a key airline hub, shutting down all flights in and out only in planes carrying cancer cells."

While initial results are promising, the research so far has only concluded that AOH1996 can suppress tumour growth in cell and animal models - with the first phase of a clinical trial in humans now under way.

The pill has been shown to be effective in treating cells derived from breast, prostate, brain, ovarian, cervical, skin and lung cancers.

PCNA had previously been labelled as "undruggable" - and it is hoped the breakthrough could lead to more personalised, targeted medicines for cancer in the future.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yet another tool in oncologist toolbox, and looks like a pretty capable one. looks like it also has an effect of sensitizing cancer cells to other chemotherapy drugs

more technical writeup https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/new-mode-cancer-treatment

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This treatment looks to give us the ability to buy time. So many treatments just cannot act fast enough or are so weakening at higher doses that the person doesn't make it. I think we will see a lot of new treatment options that give us room for creativity when the first option fails. I've lost a lot of people I love to cancer in my life. I'm hopeful that those I love still living will be with us longer, so I can love and enjoy them more. At least until the next thing after cancer gets them (or me).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Heard about this on the radio yesterday, and looked into it further as we hear about “cancer curing pills” all the time and they usually are nothing. This one does seem to have traction however IF it can make it through human trials. So obviously could mean nothing if it doesn’t pass this phase, and it will be there a long time, but this is very promising news.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Joe Brandon filling his campaign promise /s

But it is good to see more treatment options

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Looks like a treatment, not a cure, that will require ongoing supplies of medication. This is a pharma wet dream. We can’t cure your cancer, but we can keep it from growing for just $2000 per pill that cost us $1 to make.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you really think that pill cost 1$? A single approved therapy takes years to develop and over a billion dollars. But hey if you're view of an entire industry is shaped through Facebook comments I don't blame you.

Further, maintenance therapy already exists in many cancers. This is not a new concept for literally anyone in the field of medicine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No I don’t think it will cost a dollar. That was hyperbole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's what it is, a subscription based cure.

"as long as you buy our medicine you will live!"

I sure hope it isn't like this. Medicine just enough to stave the progress of the illness but also not enough to cure it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I know what you're saying, but cancer being a chronic condition is great.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

"Why don't they just cure cancer!"

🙄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

At the moment, it doesn’t look like anything, since it’s just now in phase 1 trials, so nobody knows.

But if it does what it says, then yes, it might actually be part of a cure.

And I don’t know if you’re aware of it, as of now we don’t have a cure for cancer: https://xkcd.com/931/

You can look up the average treatment cost today, it’s something like $150000, good for your that you already know the price of this pill and that it’s big pharma‘s wet dream.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I just created the summary! You can find it at https://lemmings.world/comment/894209. (I tried to create the link for your instance but I failed miserably, for which I'm very sorry).