It's probably temporary, go to bed, the tech fairies will fix it till you get up in the morining.
We might be laughing about this now, but I bet someone already is working on something like this.
Yeah, the guy in the video said that as well, that's why I was wondering if it's in xbps-src.
And that is why we have peer review, so dogshit doesn't make it as cold hard fact into science.
Oh, cool, didn't know that, thanks π.
But xbps is still keeps track of installed packages, right, xi is just a script.
The same applies, try it.
I like the DE, seems really polished. Wonder if Void has it in xbps-src.
It is not required for people to consciously falsify data for science to come up with false conclusions.
This is true, but even if it unintentionally falsifies data, other discoveries with correct data will reveal that this other data is wrong, so this theory will be put under question, to see if it holds water. If it doesn't, than that theory is rejected.
That is what science does, it corrects itself if new more correct data is presented, thus striving for perfection.
The idea is to know everything about everything. This is of corse the goal, which is practically unachievable.
Good morning βΊοΈ.
What happened to it?
Science is meant to be objective, not subjective. If you falsify results, then human traits corrupt it, which means that that is no longer science.
view more: next βΊ
The barbie girl worf scared away the other one in me.