AES

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I am using an Intel NUC with 32gig ram. Super efficient.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Man... Perez. RB would be struggling to win the WDC and WCC with 2 of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A fake taxi like they say.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

But few can be relocked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If you are on Android I recommend NZB360 as companion app. It's freaking awesome.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, thanks for that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes ofc they can. The Wireguard protocol is not designed to be hidden.

Interesting read: https://www.ntkernel.com/how-to-bypass-egypts-wireguard-ban/

429
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Lemmy: "that is a fair point"

Reddit: "you fucking moron"

12
Hide Lemmy UI behind VPN? (lemmy.ronsmans.eu)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I have set up a small Lemmy instance (Docker + NPM) for testing purposes, and I was wondering if it is possible to only expose the activitypub to the internet and hide the Lemmy UI behind my personal wireguard VPN. So the UI is only accessible on the local LAN.

view more: next ›