AHemlocksLie

joined 9 months ago
[–] AHemlocksLie 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh well it's in a doodle on the internet, must be gospel-grade truth.

[–] AHemlocksLie 1 points 1 week ago

The security of these certificates only guarantees that you're talking to the right server and that your communication is encrypted. For other concerns like of the server was hacked, you'll need something else. No individual piece of security tech can secure everything. You as the site admin can only use it as one piece of a comprehensive security package that defends against what you perceive as the most credible threats.

Asking where's the security is like asking where's the protection with a bullet proof vest if you can still get shot in the head. A vest offers one type of protection, but a comprehensive security package is going to include other pieces like helmets.

[–] AHemlocksLie 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know what the process is like to become a certificate authority. I imagine the answer is technically yes but realistically no, at least not as an individual. You'd be providing a critical piece of internet infrastructure, so you'd need the world to consider you capable of providing the service reliably while also capable of securing the keys used to sign certificates so they can't be forged. It's a big responsibility that involves putting a LOT of trust in the authority, so I don't think it's taken very lightly.

[–] AHemlocksLie 24 points 1 week ago (28 children)

It's to make sure you're actually reaching your intended endpoint. If I'm visiting a site for the first time, how do I know I actually have THEIR certificate? If it's self generated, anybody could sign a certificate claiming to be anybody else. The current system is to use authority figures who validate certificates are owned by the site you're trying to visit. This means you have a secure connection AND know you're interacting with the correct site.

[–] AHemlocksLie 26 points 3 weeks ago

As if it would have slowed Trump down even a single second if Biden hadn't done it. Trump has already shown he doesn't give a SHIT about norms, customs, ethics, fucking anything that gets in the way of enriching himself and his friends or stroking his ego.

[–] AHemlocksLie 8 points 3 weeks ago

They may not fix noise pollution, but they seem to reduce it. At least at urban speeds where I can be near them when they're driving, them sure seem to be significantly quieter than gas cars.

[–] AHemlocksLie 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Because the car is heavier overall, which means they put more wear on the tires per mile driven.

[–] AHemlocksLie 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Some people have a bad reaction to shaving in general. If I recall correctly, black people have a stronger predisposition to having that issue, but I have no idea the mechanism behind it. I assume it's something with the hair being different since head hair is often texturally different from what white people have. I'm not familiar with it happening in other ethnic groups, but I don't know much about it, so it's possible.

[–] AHemlocksLie 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bruh dems voted for it. They did what they could with the votes they had at the time. REPUBLICANS stone walled it because it's party over country for them. They probably hoped that almost getting lynched by an angry fucking mob the sitting president refused to call in the National Guard on would get at least enough to flip to convict, but nope, republicans will apparently literally die before they vote for country over party.

[–] AHemlocksLie 0 points 1 month ago

Primarily republicans. That's the party that benefits most from voter suppression, gerrymandering, shitty voting systems, etc. Ranked choice voting exists in some capacity in over a dozen states, and it trends heavily towards left leaning states.

The more important fact, however, is that it's an unknown idea that's not interesting enough to attract attention over more immediate problems.

[–] AHemlocksLie 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ranked choice voting exists in some regions of the US already. It sure as fuck won't come from the Republicans, but if voters actually cared to demand it, they could see it happen. It's not impossible, just utterly unknown to most of the populace.

[–] AHemlocksLie -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You're never going to get meaningful change voting third party under the American voting system. A first past the post voting system will ALWAYS result in a two party system. If we hurt the current parties by voting third party enough to kill one, we'll just replace the dead party. It might be an improvement at first, but eventually, all the same forces push us back into the same end result after a while.

The US needs major reform to the electoral system. Switch from first past the post to something like ranked choice or approval voting. Abolish the fucking electoral college, which some states are attempting with a law to automatically grant all electoral college votes to the popular vote winner if enough states agree to make it guarantee the winner. Expand and guarantee access to mail in voting. And indirectly, reinvest in the fucking education system.

Of course, with full control of the federal government going to Republicans who benefit from all these problems, there's no way any of it gets addressed now.

view more: next ›