Aceticon

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 hours ago

Books, lots and lots of books.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Mate, the horse whip and the wheel were Technology back when they got invented.

It's a massivelly generic word.

Absolutelly some Technology has reduced drudgery. Meanwhile some Technology has managed to increase it (for example: one can make the case that the mobile phone, by making people be always accessible, has often increased pressure on people, though it depends on the job), some Technology has caused immense Environmental destruction, some Technology has even caused epidemics of psychological problems and so on.

Not only is there a lot of stuff in the big umbrella called Technology, but the total effect of one of those things is often dependent on how its its used and Capitalism seems especially prone to inventing and using Technology that's very good for a handful of people whilst being bad for everybody else.

One can't presume that just because something can be classified as Technology it will reduce drudgery or in even that it will be overall a good thing, even if some past Technologies did.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

Best Windows built-in way to open files with Unix end lines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

Pfew ... I moved to Linux just in time!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

I spontaneously curse at it, in 4 different (spoken) languages even and abundantly so at times, but I don't feel the need to actually write down the swear words.

Writting it down just doesn't feel the same as merelly just letting out those expletives that naturally arise during the making (and, especially, testing) of software.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Is that but on the side of the head. It can also be tapping on the side of the head.

The Dutch gesture for intelligent is touching the side of the head with the index finger, which can be confused with the second version of the Portuguese one for crazy.

Mind you, I just realized I'm not sure about those things anymore (I lived for over 2 decades abroad) and had to google to make sure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Related to that, the whole physical signalling stuff is quite a mess.

For example there are cultures were waving your head up and down back and forth does not mean "Yes", it means "No".

I found this kind of stuff out when I moved from my homeland, Portugal, to The Netherlands: it turns out the signal for "he/she is crazy" in Portugal is the same as the signal for "he/she is intelligent" in The Netherlands. Mind you, for me it was a great source of humour.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

That's Me IRL!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

A Racism so institutionalized that it's written down on the Constitution isn't Liberalism and denying the vote to the millions who used to live there (and some who still do) by denyng them citizenship isn't Democracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That can indeed be a problem.

It is however not what the MIT guys wrote as being the problem: they quite literally said the problem with too much solar generation at peak times is that it drives prices down.

Also, curiously, the prices being driven down actually helps with the real technical problem that you point out: those consumers who can move their consumption times will tend to move them to those hours when the prices are lowest thus helping solve it. Same thing goes for investors: the more the price is pushed down at peak solar production times, the more appealing it is to invest in things like storage or even solutions with lower efficiency (such as green hydrogen or electricity transportation cables to markets less well served by solar).

The low prices aren't the problem from a technical point of view, quite the contrary: they're an incentive to invest in solutions (which is going to employ a lot of techies, so supposedly MIT would be all in favor of it)

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

So by Israel's own standard of discourse, they're "using human shields" and hence any amount of killing of Israeli civilians is perfectly justified not matter how great the disproportion of civilians to non-civilians killed, their age or gender.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

A rabidly racist Appartheid State founded on 19th century white colonialist values which it has preserved and even strengthened ever since isn't a Liberal Democracy, quite the contrary.

view more: next ›