They have a history of blocking oil terminals. All it achieves is much less media coverage and a quick stop to it.
Adanisi
Hmmm, you complain, but yet you participate in society. Curious!
You mean like when they blockaded oil terminals and it got not nearly as much attention as this and got them swiftly whisked away?
The part where it's action targeting the oil companies? You know, like you were suggesting they do?
It's not hard to look up.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-61347944
Took 2 seconds.
They literally DID. The fact you don't know about it shows why they also do their publicity stunts.
Yeah, media bias fact check, totally not based on some guys political opinions...
Lemmy.zip is on 0.19.5
This is disgusting.
It would have been easier to just remove these restrictions for everyone.
Enumerating every user to get the vote count on every single post/comment seems too computationally expensive.
Wah wah wah, my stuff's been preserved and I dont like it.
Lmao you think Google needs to go through Archive to scrape your site? Delusional.
The mechanisms used to serve ads over the internet nowadays are nasty in a privacy sense, and a psychological manipulation sense. And you want people to be affected by them just to line your pockets? Are you also opposed to ad blockers by any chance?
And how do you suggest a site which has been wiped off the face of the internet gets archived? Maybe we need to invest in a time machine for the Internet Archive?
What do you mean by "engagement", exactly? Clicking on ads?