BigHaas

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm gonna need to see some specific posts plotted for reference

 

5.10 follower, hoping to get on the gap or rim, hmu

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Everyone will take the hexaco personality test then uh we'll do some statistics I guess. Get some married couples that still like each other to also take the hexaco then slap the data into some kind of model. And then everyone will have a mathematically ideal partner and no right to complain about it.

 

Sorry folks this will be a black block only season

6
POTATOES (hexbear.net)
 

STARCH STARCH STARCH STARCH STARCH STARCH STARCH

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Bring a light up yoyo. Compete with the strippers.

 

Gee whiz I wish I knew what my opinion on Russia is supposed to be but I'm too poor for the NY Times

8
Escargot (m.youtube.com)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I like to tell them they don't know basic definitions too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Lmao dudes rock

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I love the idea of him and a photographer friend posing for each other in a mirror

"Oh yeah dude that looks hard as hell, now pop the eyebrow... Perfect! Okay now hold it for ten minutes for the camera"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

(For re-nomination for speedy deletion due to WP:G11.) This page is not unambiguously promotional because it does not list any achievements of Carson's that are unsourced, it does not advertise for any product/service, and it has no external links except for the official website in the infobox (so cannot be external link spamming). Per WP:WEIGHT, "If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts". Everything is cited. The sources back up all claims made in the article. Also, the article was not intended to be promotional. I have no connection to Carson and merely made the article because I had seen a plethora of articles about her (ie. more than enough to meet WP:GNG). To the best of my human ability, the article is written with NPOV. Furthermore, even if the article was written in a promotional tone, the arguments I have just made show that the article is not so overly promotional that it could not be fixed. And according to WP:G11, "If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." Samsmachado (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Right that's not even close to gooning territory

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Yeah this is it, your will gets crushed after about a decade of office work, which is kind of shameful so you end up projecting it into anyone still optimistic enough to do self improvement or activism or whatever is happening... Maybe the media directs a lot of it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Nah that's the cope explanation. There are dozens of seamless cat scans

view more: ‹ prev next ›