[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Well I for one have never heard about anybody doing anything creative without being paid for it.
/s

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If a transsexual can't have proper healthcare, it can in fact result in death, that is very real.
Another thing that's real is that they are treated so poorly in general that they have the highest suicide rate by far of any minority.
Finally many choose not to live as the gender they wish they could, because it's too problematic even dangerous. Even if this isn't a physical death, it is killing the existence of people that can live their life as transgender.

Much the same way as the Iranian president when he visited New York some years ago, claimed that Iran did not have homosexuals, so there was no oppression of them.
A completely ridiculous claim we know is biologically impossible, and we know is false because they seek refuge in the west.
And we know Iran executes people for being homosexual, which of course is the ultimate genocide of homosexuals.

Or will you deny that too?
https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3642673

Iranian president says country has no gays

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The House of Lords serves as a check and balance against a government running amok.

But checks and balances from a body that by design is vastly conservative and somewhat religious is not a FAIR checks and balances.
If the government is elected democratically instead of first past the post like in UK, the checks and balances is democracy itself, but also the supreme court, as laws must align with the constitution.
Parlament is also a form of checks and balances.

So no House of lords is not a form of Checks and Balances, they are a form of oppressing the will of the people, so they don't take too much power or money away from the rich. That's what it was designed for, not as an instrument to improve democracy.

Ideally though, we could do with a House of … whatever’s below Common, because if the ones in the Commons are commoners, what does that make the rest of us?

Rulers will probably never be actually average. Even in a pretty good democracy. But I can say for sure, we are closer here in Denmark than the UK, because our democracy is better designed and more democratic.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How is lack of healthcare = Not being represented?
You are making a strawman argument, there is much more to it than not being represented.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Lack of healthcare and lack of rights and protections that are common for other minorities, together with a huge deal of oppression, often violence and sometimes murder, is absolutely a kind of genocide, and in no way disrespectful to other forms of genocide.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

UK still has the stupid house of lords, but maybe Labour has enough support to get rid of that too?
Apart from being stupid by life time membership, it's extra stupid for having mandated religious influence. Truly a leftover from medieval times that has no place in a modern democracy.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Good question, but not in these shoes me think.
I have been further though, and looked way more like, but that was with Adidas.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

At a minimum immigrants should be required to declare they respect basic norms and requirements in our societies, and breach of them could result in expulsion.
I'm thinking norms like respecting equal rights for women, respect our democracy, and respect other minorities, and respect that their religion is not more important than our laws.

I think to some degree the extreme right is rising because this lack of respect results in lack of respect the other way too. Which is harmful both ways, both to our democracy, and to the many immigrants that actually make an effort.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Bernie and AOC are very good too. There are probably others, USA has a lot of politicians. It's impossible to know but a fraction of them.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago

I 100% agree, Al Franken was amazing at framing things and putting them into perspective. The sacrifice of him was a huge misunderstanding and completely undeserved.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nope there was a survey recently, that showed a clear majority among Republican voters support Ukraine.
Unfortunately that is not the case for Trump and the crazy MAGA crowd. And they are the ones running the show.
Some of them are probably also delusional enough to believe Trump will help Ukraine with the peace plan Trump claims to have. Despite every sane person knows Trump will just demand Ukraine to yield, because they are not getting any more help.

Of course the support for Ukraine is bigger among Democrat voters, but that doesn't change that there also is a clear majority among Republican voters.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Essence of Whispered Dreams."
That actually sounds crazy cool, I would definitely buy that for my wife if it was available. Also the color is absolutely perfect.

15
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

https://noshingwiththenolands.com/what-is-the-scoville-scale/
Scroll lidt ned, så er der en fremragende oversigt.

27
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
116
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
55
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Russia has launched an offensive into the Kharkiv region, and it has created a lot of alarmist news reports. In reality it is difficult to see what Russia's plan is, and it is not self-evident that it is a smart use of resources. In this video I discuss whether we might be seeing a return to the fragmented command structures that Russia had in the beginning of the war.

75
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

My old $200 Motorola G9 Power phone lasted almost 4 years with only very minor scratches. Obviously in that period I have dropped it a few times getting out of the car, where the phone sometimes work itself out of my pant pocket while I drive, and then it slips out when I get out of the car. But no problem on my previous phones, despite the Moto had cheap Panda glass front.

Then I bought my $800 glass back Xiaomi 13T Pro in January, and I loved the phone for the camera and good specs. But alas after only 4 months, and single drop of just 30 cm while sitting on the porch, the glass back immediately cracked! The back now looks like an ugly mess, and the high water resistance is very likely gone too.

For sure the last time I buy a phone with a glass back!!!

I wonder why glass back is so popular, and I curse the media for reviewing the Samsung Galaxy S2 as "feeling a bit cheap", because the back was synthetic, and drop tests showed it was 10 times as durable as the iPhone with its glass back.

Samsung did it right in the beginning, glass backs are a curse.

PS: I don't use condoms for my phones, if they need that for daily use, it's an obvious design flaw!!!

The glass back is supposedly there to give a premium feel to the phone. But because it's fragile, people have to use a cover, but with the cover, the premium feel of a glass back is gone anyways?
How is glass back not a design flaw?

EDIT FOR CLARIFICATION:

I am not clumsy, that's why I believe the phone should be able to last without cover. This was the first time the phone slid out of my packet, and I've NEVER dropped it out of my hands. One 30 cm slip and it's broken. Where for instance my Moto had maybe 4-6 in all over the years, and remained unscathed, apart from some tiny scratches.
The sliding out of pocket does occur maybe a couple of times per year, but it's a low drop, and the phone should absolutely be able to handle that tiny drop, as it's an item for everyday use.
I've also never had problems with scratches on my screen on any phone, which is the reason people use screen protectors I guess, which I don't either, because they are ugly, for instance they create a tiny ring around the camera, and they feel awful IMO, my phone came with it, and it took exactly 10 seconds for me to decide to remove it, because I could feel the edge of the screen protector when using the phone.
But please stop with the dropping my phone regularly comments! Just because I dropped my Moto a few times (slid out of pocket) over almost 4 years! Always from low height, which it should be able to handle a few times.

64
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Profits were expected to be halved from the 2022 1.2 tn Rubles, but instead they made a loss in 2023 of 629bn Rubles or £5.5bn.

24
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

.

65
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It used to be very convenient that when searching for something that had a geographic location, Google searches used to show a small map which linked to Google maps when pressed.
Now all I get i a tiny useless map, that doesn't have any of the feature of Google maps, and often I don't even get that.
Anyone know why that is? And if there is a fix?
I use Firefox, but I'm guessing it's independent of browser, unless Google is up to their shenanigans again.
I've added Google maps as search option, which luckily is dead easy in Firefox to do. At the same time I added Open Street Map, to minimize Google map use to maybe show them they are losing traffic.

EDIT:

I think this is the reason as u/[email protected] writes:

If you’re in Europe, it may be due to the DMA.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/pixels/article/2024/03/06/digital-markets-act-how-the-way-you-use-google-maps-and-messenger-is-changing_6591969_13.html

You may also have noticed something new on Google, when looking for the address of a place: It’s now impossible to click on the map that appears in your search results.

Google is one of the “gatekeepers” according to the DMA (Digital Markets Act). The law recently went into effect. It is supposed to lessen the amount of preferential treatment the big tech companies give themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act

23
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
41
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The total combat losses of the enemy from 02.24.22 to 01.20.24 approximately amounted to:

personnel - about 375,270 (+750) people,
tanks ‒ 6171 (+4) units,
armored combat vehicles ‒ 11,455 (+10) units,
artillery systems - 8868 (+14) units,
MLRS – 967 (+1) units,
air defense equipment ‒ 654 (+0) units,
aircraft – 331 (+0) units,
helicopters – 324 (+0) units,
UAVs of the operational-tactical level - 6934 (+5),
cruise missiles – 1818 (+0),
ships/boats ‒ 23 (+0) units,
submarines – 1 (+0) units,
automotive equipment and tank trucks – 11,848 (+17) units,
special equipment ‒ 1389 (+5)

The data is being verified.

Beat the occupier! Together we will win! Our strength is in the truth!

Source Ministry of Defense of Ukraine : https://www.mil.gov.ua/news/2024/01/20/ponad-375-tisyach-osib-bilshe-50-tisyach-odinicz-bojovoi-tehniki-%E2%80%93-zagalni-vtrati-rosii-vid-pochatku-shirokomasshtabnoi-vijni-proti-ukraini/

Translation with Google Translate.

103
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Buffalox

joined 1 year ago