One liners are
ByteJunk
There are stark differences between the scenarios you're presenting, but going to the core of your point, is it even legal to paint a photorealistic nude?
I don't know of any court cases about this specific subject, but I remember when Rush painted Tiger Woods ("The masters at Augusta"), he was sued.
He got away with not having to pay money to Tiger Woods, but partly because it's a stylized painting and it pushed towards first amendment rights. This wouldn't work in a photorealistic depiction, so it seems highly unlikely that such a painting would be OK...
Oooooh! DUNGEON MESHI
inundates you with porn which might not be what you're going for at the moment
Oh. How... Uh... I'll be right back.
I'd do it just to style on the new guy, start with something like "ah, so humanity has lost the skills that we possessed in the days of yore..."
(TL note: this is in reference to companies refusing to up the pay for their skilled workforce, and ending up paying more to new guys that'll have to learn it all from scratch)
It's complicated. Technically no, but God can roll out a new image with the updates, so in practice, yes?
Why is religion never simple...
I get the feeling in OPs post, but for those unfamiliar, there are more people on the ballot other than the 2 main picks. This even varies by state, as they can have different criteria for defining who makes it to the ballot.
So perhaps a black woman has at some point ran for president (as in, made it to the ballot at least)?
"I haven't donated $45m".
He could have donated 50m, so I'd take it with a grain of salt until the fillings are actually public
But there's a chance that, cut off from the sea, the water collected wouldn't be enough to offset losses (evaporation, etc), right? Kind of like how the Mediterranean was dry when it was cut off from the Atlantic?
It was damned from the start.
I'd start by checking her bras, maybe she left them there?
I've read all of Book. Well, most of Book. I like the pictures of fish... of which there are none, Book!