They work well and just make a lot of sense. However, I think they tend to be more expensive than electric clothes dryers.
Where does the pipe go?
You can run your own instance and votes don't really matter.
I finally started on a project to improve the flowerbeds in front of my house. I removed the arborvitae and whatever was growing on the ends, replacing them with chaste tree shrubs. I also planted a line of bee balm in front. Hopefully they all take!
No, and I am honor-bound not to explain it.
Semi-liquid democracy plus confederalism. The votes that delegates bring are multiplied by some function of the votes assigned to them as well as the soldiers and funding they commit.
I agree that no amount of NO~X~ exposure is completely safe, but per the EPA and the WHO, some amount of exposure is safe enough. Otherwise, there's no point to specifying exposure limits. Per the link you provided, the WHO guidelines for NO~2~ exposure are 10ug/m3 (5.316ppb) for one year and 25ug/m3 (13.291ppb) for 24 hours. The EPA standard is 100 ppb for one hour and 53 ppb for one 1 year. None of the tests in the Dobbin paper showed concentrations greater than either of the EPA limits. The best performing fan that was tested kept concentrations under the WHO yearly limit, which was not exceeded for more than about 45 minutes with either of the other fans. That is in spite of the fans not meeting the CFMs claimed by the manufacturer.
Indeed, people might not properly install or use their exhaust fans, and there should be regulations and enforcement to improve on that, but that's just the way it is. Regarless of stove type, you need an exhaust fan for protection from particulates anyway. So if you have a gas connection, you might as well get a gas fired stove since it provides a superior cooking experience at a lower price point with fewer electronics.
Having taught my daughter how capitalism actually works.
Why did you edit your reply like this instead of making a new one to me?
You originally claimed that proper ventilation was not available for residential applications. The paper I found, indirectly referenced by the article you shared, lists three models that were all capable of keeping NO~X~ exposure under the the 1 h U.S. ambient air quality standard of 100 ppb. That is the relevant standard and it's mentioned in the text your quoted from the article. Any fan that can beat it is objectively adequate and all three models that were tested did so consistently.
it notes that you should be using an electric stovetop but that vents can reduce the exposure.
In the text you quoted, it says that you can replace your gas stove, not that you should. That's a far cry from what you originally said: "You should not be using a gas stove if you care about your respiratory health or the respiratory health of your family."
I think users can just sort the comments by 'top'.