CrypticCoffee

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

How did ee, and sh.itjust.works grow? Because they were open. You have a short memory if you don't remember how many instances closed, during API blackout.

I didn't want to pick an instance that was running on a thinkpad that would get switched off when someone got bored.

Federation was confusing for many. Many used the join Lemmy website and options that were general purpose open instances that were English speaking and open were not huge. People made decisions in a short period of time and many went with world, ee, and sh.it. It isn't baffling. It is also no shock that people set up communities where they register and may be big enough to survive. Who would create a community that disappears in 3 weeks.

You painting users as brainless sheep does nothing more than give you some feeling superiority. Maybe your fragile ego needs that. I'll help if you need it. Congratulations, you're so smart and clever. More so than most. Thanks for stepping on your soap box and imparting your wisdom/red hot takes upon us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ee wasn't big originally, but it was one of the few instances that were big enough to not dissappear, run by a competent sys admin, and small enough to not be affected by the big instance performance challenges, while keep registrations open when many instances shut the door on newcomers. Basically, ee, sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world were there main options for people moving across. Their sensible stewardship has led to growth, and trust is why it has kept growing.

Federation means people can choose, and they do. It doesn't mean everything will be exactly the same size and stay small. An instance needs good sysadmin who will investigate issues an liase with dev teams to get them fixed. People will gravitate to those instances run by talented devs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There is most definitely a circus, but absolutely no fun to be found here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Appreciate the honesty and transparency. I imagine running this is a wee bit stressful, so sharing those lessons really helps to stick with it and appreciate the journey.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, and an interesting follow on, if someone runs a technology consultancy, can they post about their business successes and issues? They're in the tech business after all. Or is this simply limited to the who's who of bad actors? The big, 3 4, 10, 15? What is the cut off?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You mean like non-reactionary content? Stuff that teaches us, and we learn, and we feel hope? Quality rather than hyperbole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's not just an inconvenience. I unfollowed the sub because the quality of the content was poor. I want to learn about technology, not social media companies and every minutiae about their employees bowel movements. I'm getting more value from Linux than from here, despite the fact some of it is more low level than I'd like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Has anyone proven a technology for that long and that consistently that it is safe. I've seen quite the contrary and sensible legislators expect a human there in case of issue.I'd expect that for years before a reasonable level ofconfidentce is reached.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I would agree with this. Purpose of the application rather than technical implementation defines its use. Though it can do many things Signal and WA also do

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

I do agree with you. It's a universe of federated software and matrix is federated. ActivityPub is an implementation of an idea.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Lemm ee c boobies perhaps?

view more: ‹ prev next ›