Daxter101

No longer a mathematical problem, but determine the largest piece that can be removed, before it becomes apparent to onlookers that the leftover pizza has been tampered with.

Remember the premise, cheating is lying about the situation, and acting on those needs without consent.

There is no world where that is healthier than whatever mutual agreement the couple could end up in, after honestly sharing their situation.

If the care for the needs of the child is real and actually shared between the parents, anything ranging from a sexually open marriage, to a divorce with uninterrupted coparenting, is leagues better than pretending you want to be there while actually both having a bad time around your child's other parent, and constantly lying.

If you don't care about a relationship, the other person still might, and them being hurt should matter to you.

End the relationship since you don't care about it anyways, to let the other person move on with the least lies and sense of betrayal, and then fuck everyone you wish.

Cheating isn't a way to end a relationship, cheating is lying in order to keep it longer.

So, there was a community called "non voters", created by MindTraveller?

Ada locked it down for not confirming with the spirit of the instance (I'm going to shallowly read into the name of the community, and say that the lock seems fair, from the outside).

Then, it reads to me like MindTraveller made another community, which was also taken down, and got him banned along with it.

Why did those things happen? Why was a second community made? Why was it banned? Why are you claiming that it was an unfair ban?

Honestly, if those points aren't clarified, Ada appears to be really reasonable from a bystander's perspective.

I also have always wanted to sleep in a huge dog bed but, unfortunately

Summer

I'm already suffering the tyranny of sweating all my liquids out twice a night, this would add a whole extra dimension of heat (pun not intended)

God damn acab I swear

As someone who has absolutely no idea what is going on:

Can you provide sources for the things you're saying?

A raw opinion for its opinion's sake... I'm not sure it's a fitting post for something of such gravity, in the instance's meta community.

Sweet Jesus.

I'm ashamed to say it might even work on me though

... Yeah it is 🫠🥲

In literal terms it translates to "before-the-road" (pro - drómou)

(this literal translation includes the ambiguity of before- as in 'temporally before', or before- as in 'in front of')

So any way you slice it, it's pretty ironic.

"Prodromou" is a Greek surname, with the rough meaning "the one who walks the road before others".

So him being "a visionary" is fun, lol

What... What even is this comment. Why even pick these totally inconspicuous movies to fill your triplet?

I understand nothing.

Doomerism gets you nowhere.

Voting for the 70% Hitler instead of the 100% Hitler is the right move, not because it will save you or solve any of your problems, but because it gives you time, to create solutions.

Rich fucks won't save you. Community and cooperation might. But those need time.

So vote for the least fascistic fascist available, and use the time to find solutions.