Unfortunately they are also a huge harm to every other worker.
Negatives to society drematically outweigh one advantage to a small population.
it is not considered to be fully reversible according to the NHS.
That is an over statement of what the NHS says. They claim it is not proven to be 100% reversible. A very very different statement.
No actual harm has been proven. Just cases that the cause is not yet clear.
but he clearly has groups on the left in his targets.
Where in his statement do you see that. It seems to me his wording was non-biased.
Of course, just releasing prisoners based on crime and & how much of the assigned sentence is served. Has exactly the same effect. Without any ability to accuse of prejudice.
The tax only applys to soda. Fruit juces chocolate bars and all the other crap in vending machines is the same tax as always.
While still crappy calories, they are all better than soda. As a % of the carbs is not refined sugar.
That is what we do with all sewerage. It is basically the point of a sewage treatment plant. The very places that due to the water companies refusing to invest in them. But instead paying out huge dividends to share holders. Are now overloading and chucking shit into our rivers.
Yes we should build more of them. Yes we should be arempting new technologies.
But if the water co,panies after 40 plus tears have not invested in doing so.
We also should be taking them back into public hands before spending more money on them. Cos hell they are not capable of managing the money themselves.
Yeah in some cases. But not the majority.
Amd hopefully that will never be the case.
Because while we have the legal concept of being to young to make decisions for yourself. That concept means children do not get to screw their life up because learning is boring.
Once you decide children choosing to not educate themselves is acceptable. You throw away all other ideals of an age of maturity. While the US seems happy to do that with crimes etc. Most of the rest of the world is more logical.
Unfortunately teaching is not really about the children's future. Its about the society.
Agree. Although this was about an exercise on nato borders rather then a state joining China.
It is still in international waters. So tough shit. While it being done on nato borders during an important nato conference. Again tough shit but clearly China trying to make news.
Not sure that question is as important as. Is your national government hiring enough ewoks and planting the trees. Ready to defend when these thing inevitably join the empire.
Not OP.
But the UK press has had this power since at least the early 1800s. When they were directly responsible for delaying the UK abolition of slavery. By outright lying to the UK population about the life of slaves.
Access to the internet has definitely reduced the influence in the last 20 years. But the same spending is effecting social media.
The daily mail has the worst reputation. Given, it was set up intentionally by a wealthy Mongol in the 1930s to influence commoner ideals. (commoner being the political term at the time, House of Lords vs commons). But the UK freedom of the press ideal truly distorts how wealth can be used to influence UK press.
You are technically correct. Best kind.
But it is also a problem of convincing voters. Something modern right wing labour has chosen not to do. And in fairness, fptp makes hard as only 30% of voters believing right wing ideals can turn the election.
I mean, it is a finance in so much as how you choose to fund things matters. Spending money not replaced with income has a cost, long or short term. And choosing to eat that cost is a fiscal decision.
Be that cost weaker currency o trade with 3rd party nations or a lack of trust from voters next election so not having the time to implement solutions.