JackOverlord

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I know that. And Indie Wiki Buddy redirects to the new wiki, while libredirect doesn't.

I used ORS as an example. The same goes for most wikis I personally use. Path of exile, Terraria, etc. all have migrated to new wikis and Indie Wiki Buddy redirects all links from the old fandom pages to the new wikis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have also used that in the past, but when I did it only redirected fandom to BreezeWiki and not the other independent wiki.

For example, Indie Wiki Buddy does this, while libredirect didn't: oldschoolrunescape.fandom.com -> oldschool.runescape.wiki

And it still doesn't say it does that. Am I wrong with that? Cause I'd definitely use libredirect if that was the case.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For anyone who wants to avoid fandom: https://getindie.wiki/

Redirects any fandom wiki to their Indie alternative which are in most cases the only ones actually being updated.

For every wiki where that isn't possible because they only exist on fandom, it redirects them to alternative frontends, which remove all the fandom crap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's times like these where I love having a Gouvernement that actually cares about protecting my data.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm using Edge for work and I know what you're talking about, but you can just turn almost all of it off. Edge is pretty customizable. It doesn't beat Firefox but it's still decent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They have explicitly stated that bikes (and bike lanes) won't exist in the base game at release. It is a bit hidden, as they wrote that only on Twitter and in a comment under dev diary 1.

Bikes will almost certainly be a DLC again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Another pixel 6 user here.

I personally chose the Pixel over other Android phones, because Google guarantees 5 years of security updates.

Unlike everyone else, where you're lucky to get even 3 years of updates.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They said on Twitter and in the comments of the linked post, that there won't be any bikes at all at release.

They'll very likely be a DLC.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Communities: Basically impossible, unless Meta/Facebook has a public list somewhere.

Instances: That will be public, because they have to register the domain somewhere and I'll also assume that they will actually want people to know which ones are theirs, so their users join those.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey, another Joey user.

Nice.

Usually doesn't get mentioned when people talk about third party apps.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same.

I wasn't convinced at the very beginning, but once they had the hangar demo out, with that insanely detailed, intractable spaceship, I was so impressed I spend about a hundred dollars on it to "help development".

At this point I've long since given up hope this mess will be finished in a reasonable timeframe. I'm just glad Starfield is coming up and from the trailers and interviews it's looking like a suitable replacement.

And since it's the creation engine again, any major or minor mistakes will have a mod that fixes them sooner or later.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless they try to push the creation club by blocking mods and thus community patches,

Unlike certain other devs/publishers I don't think Bethesda are dumb enough to think Skyrim would have been so successful for so long if they'd blocked mods.

If there's one company I'm certain values mods very highly, it's Bethesda. Simultaneously it wouldn't surprise me at all if they put in the creation club right from the get go and tried pushing it more. But outright blocking, or hindering the creation of "normal" mods, doesn't seem like something they'd do.

view more: ‹ prev next ›