Let me put it this way: Straw man arguments won't work here.
edit: "A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction"
There's no difference between randos on the internet, everything is taken with a grain of salt and healthy suspicion. Doesn't matter which rando it comes from.
I think it's telling there was no reply,
Because if you look closely with a keen eye,
There was just a guy,
No one knows who he is,
But he says to listen to his ideas,
Opinion after opinion but lacking constitution,
Unable to face the prosecution.
A bunch of ragtag militiamen vs one of the most advanced militaries in the world. I get that they’re desperate, but this was an inevitable outcome (as terrible as it is).
This seems like you're trying to make a factual claim. Again, I don't disagree with it but you're just a rando on the internet just like the dude in the video. At least he's put his face and name to his allegations/opinions.
tbf, you're a rando posting your opinion on it to the internet just like him, just in text format. Why should we listen to you?
With that said, everything needs to be taken with a grain of salt. You can listen, take it in, and research more if something doesn't seem right to you.
Fair enough. I was thinking you stitched 20 queen size mattresses together too lol.
But why do you need such a large sheet?
Same, it's still free as of me writing this.
Louis Rossmann is a respectable person in the open source/right to repair arena
I recently went through the entire series again. It was 100% worth it.
I think they're trying to spell their name: Geoff. They're still learning, give it time.
one is a licensed profession that is illegal to lie about and heavily prosecuted, the other is random people writing comments/posting videos on the internet. There is a world of difference.