You know it’s a shitpost because the asparagus isn’t even cooked.

You cannot reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into.

That's merely an assumption based on a stereotype you have about people like this. Just because reason may have failed with other people like that in the past doesn't mean it's not going to work with this one, especially if you haven't even tried to reason with them and immediately go for the bigger gun of ostracism (i.e. firing).

It is not reasonable to deprive someone of their source of income for having an opinion you don't like. It IS reasonable to tell them that their opinion doesn't belong in the company chat, and give them a warning that disciplinary action may result if they do it again.

Nobody else should have to put up with an uncomfortable work environment, social club, or anything else, because we have to make accommodations to be tolerant of bigots.

You're excusing hatred with bigotry. The same argument could be used to exclude transgender people.

Either this is a typo and you meant spear, or you need glasses.

It’s a type of meme that asks you to complete song lyrics with the thing in the picture. The song in this case is “Living on a Prayer” by Bon Jovi. Here are some other examples (with solution):

Unfortunately I didn’t find a satisfying solution where I found this meme, so I can only assume that this is some sort of an anti-joke, i.e. the joke is that there is no joke, but you waste a bunch of time trying to find one anyways.

Would.

I suppose “breakfast cucumber” would work if you stress the syllables correctly

That’s because 50 would destroy the symmetry of the picture.

However, you can always throw them all into one pot and mix them together to create the 50th shade ;)

That’s clearly a pickled cucumber

NGL, this seems like a fun but utterly terrifying way to get around. There better be a ball pit at the end however, or else I don't want it.

I am aware of that paradox but I think it's misguided, because it's essentially just an excuse for neverending violence and revolution. Anytime you punish someone for not adhering to some sort of group standards, you aren't likely change their minds about those standards being a moral good. Some might relent and begrudgingly go along with them, but others will not, and in time they'll accumulate. At some point, there will be enough of them to overthrow the status quo, and then your intolerance will be replaced with theirs. So the result is that you live in an eternal state of intolerance, all in the name of tolerance. It's a sucker's game, and only fools are dumb enough to go along with it.

If you cannot defend your standards using reason, they are immoral, and they'll eventually be overthrown and abolished, as they should.

I'm afraid without any further explanation from the OP we really don't know that.

Right, so you show them who's the bigger person by being just as intolerant to them as they were to you...