[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Downsized, getting paid peanuts, and being overworked.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

It’s his own fault for shooting at his employer’s home anyway.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That’s completely fair. How about 500+?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17186303/

The next one is only ~460.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10904038/

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

I’m sure a predatory man would do the same.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Statistically, bears take rejection better than men do.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Oh, okay. You just want to be mad without fixing the situation.

Well, you can kindly go fuck yourself.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

“Standards for thee and none for me” is all I’m taking from this.

Have a great day.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

When the Democratic party’s strategists have decided that “you definitely don’t want the other guy voted in” in place of literally any other strategy is their best option, please explain to me why anyone further left of your centrism should believe that the administration will take another vote cast for them as anything but approval of the job they’ve done so far and an endorsement of more of the same.

On the flip side, to hold Biden himself accountable for the overreaction from University boards’ decisions on behalf of their corporate masters (donors, if that wasn’t clear), or responsible for the large number of Representatives and Senators making and voting for policy with their heads up their own or others’ asses, when he has been caught on the hot mic disparaging Netanyahu for how Israel is conducting itself is holding the wrong person accountable.

I get where they’re coming from. I get it on a level you clearly don’t because you have proven time and again that you have little capacity to sympathize with those who are clearly tired of voting for the “least damaging option”. Take a break and let someone else debate with them, because the more you criticize the further you’ll solidify their position.

Okay, dad?

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

I don’t really see you as being in a position to take a high ground on the basis of usernames.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

While I’m so disaffected that I’ve had to have my fire rekindled to vote for the “least damaging option” yet again, and while I’ll be dragging my feet to the booth in November, I feel from key words in this conversation that their mastery of English is surprising to the point of suspect when I consider the errors they’re committing.

I’d advise saving your energy for a less disingenuous conversation.

Have a great day.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

We know this isn’t an age-restricted reaction, so cool it with the “shaming young people” rhetoric.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Remmock

joined 1 year ago