Soyweiser

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Apologies for focusing on just one sentence of this article, but I feel like it's crucial to the overall argument:

... if [shrimp] suffer only 3% as intensely as we do ...

Does this proposition make sense? It's not obvious to me that we can assign percentage values to suffering, or compare it to human suffering, or treat the values in a linear fashion.

It reminds me of that vaguely absurd thought experiment where you compare one person undergoing a lifetime of intense torture vs billions upon billions of humans getting a fleck of dust in their eyes. I just cannot square choosing the former with my conscience. Maybe I'm too unimaginative to comprehend so many billions of bits of dust.

lol hahah.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Sadly it seems the next one is gonna be Quantum.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Not only is the universe a simulation, the Catholics just had it right, isnt that neat.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Ha very clever, but as quantum level effects only occur when somebody is looking at it, they dont have to simulate it at quark level all the time. I watched what the bleep do we know, im very smart.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Still a bit sad we are not doing nano anymore.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But this quickly runs into the 'don't create your own unbreakable crypto system' problem. There are people out there who are a lot smarter who quickly can point out the holes in these simulation arguments. (The smartest of whom go 'nah, that is dumb' sadly I'm not that enlightened, as I have argued a few times here before how this is all amateur theology, and has nothing to do with STEM/computer science (E: my gripes are mostly with the 'ancestor simulation' theory however)).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Finally computer science is a real field, there are cranks! Suck it physics and mathematics, we are a real boy now!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Finally we have a good usage for the nuclear waste warnings, we put all the copies of their music there.

"This place is a message... and part of a system of messages... pay attention to it!

Sending this message was important to us. We considered ourselves to be a powerful culture.

This place is not a place of honor... no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here... nothing valued is here.

What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us. This message is a warning about danger.

The danger is in a particular location... it increases towards a center... the center of danger is here... of a particular size and shape, and below us.

The danger is still present, in your time, as it was in ours."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, he even gets mentioned by xkcd in the same breath as Stallman or Linus. (That it turns out the latter is the least worse of the three (he actually realized that being an asshole was bad) is quite the surprise).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Gasp

This is just like the fall of Rome.

E: eurgh the people arguing against regs that help people with allergies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to jwz the current leadership of bsky isnt much better, but I have not looked into it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›