TheTetrapod

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Evidently your current instance censors that last word too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally who?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

You might be thinking of Jimmy John's.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Nobody at the grocery store I used to work at would wear the seatbelt. One time the district safety manager was touring and asked a manager (who didn't recognize her) about it and he got in so much trouble.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Wow, that one guy had a huge stick up his ass.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can Ukraine just overthrow Putin? That'd be pretty tight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair enough, that person is definitely engaging in hyperbolic rhetoric, but I don't think their point is entirely wrong. This feels like a classic case of racism and bigotry being seen as all-or-nothing situations. Those character names are obviously not coming from a place of cultural sensitivity (it's been pointed out that Cho and Chang are both family names from entirely different cultures), and while you refuse to engage with the point, portraying slavery as anything other than abominable is just a terrible decision. I would not agree with the comment OP that Rowling has always been a white supremacist, but I would say that she is/was a rather thoughtless liberal, in the centrist definition of that word.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, that's so easy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You're misremembering how the slavery plot goes, for what it's worth. In Chamber of Secrets, yes, Dobby is meant to be a sympathetic figure who we're happy is freed. However, following her pattern of "returning to a plot point that got pushback two books ago to justify it", in Goblet we learn that Dobby is a little sicko for wanting freedom and payment, and Hermione's efforts with SPEW (btw that's slang for vomit in the UK} are consistently portrayed as misguided and naive.

I think it's incredibly silly to suggest that you can't make some judgements about an author based on literally a million words that they pulled directly out of their psyche. Another classic example is Joanne's portrayal of women. If a woman is evil, she's fat, mannish, and ugly. If a woman is good, she's motherly and, in the case of Hermione, Luna, and Ginny, not like other girls. Nobody is really saying she was a hateful bigot while writing those books, but the seeds were certainly there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Just to battle against? Because gen 1 didn't have breeding, so he couldn't give out Mews, right?

Edit: oh right, legendaries can't breed anyway.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

It sounds like you've left the field, but I'll never miss a chance to proselytize bone conduction headphones. Mediocre sound quality, but they leave your ears completely open and can work through ear protection.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Insane take. If the shoe fits, wear it. Nazis are as Nazis do.

view more: next ›