aBundleOfFerrets

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

My thoughts too. Pick a lane! When you take on all the minorities at once they just become a majority again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Nasa should not have to contend with budget cuts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Whats the benefits package look like?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

If you want to remote into the linux box, I recommend sunshine+moonlight. They are designed for “gamuurz” but that just means they are efficient.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This is an odd take. There is no inherent advantage to using an unfamiliar ui on linux, there is nothing under the hood that “works better” for any specific desktop environment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Faster than a cable, unless your device has usb 3.xx

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, unless it’s a formal setting, reader comprehension comes before all else

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Alternative is like… a single gigabyte of local storage on these things

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I don’t think this is a bad question at all, personally I would prefer to mount the drive once and symlink folders for a couple reasons:

  1. It’s easier to automate
  2. it’s theoretically faster (to initialize) as symlinks are effectively free
  3. I personally like symlink syntax more than mount syntax :P

One possible con to symlinks is that certain (linux native) software can misbehave when it has to interact with them, but this is a fairly uncommon issue. Stuff ran through wine or proton should support them just fine, as they are abstracted away.

view more: ‹ prev next ›