ancom20

joined 4 years ago
 

Internet Archive (Archive.org) being sued by copyrightists.

 

Following arrest of some alleged operators and the transition to more censorship-resistant distribution methods. An eLibrary becoming a physical library.

 

Forcing an upgrade to paid plan or deleting files after 6mos.

 

Because copyright owners aren't making money off it.

 

OpenCycleMap (http://www.opencyclemap.org/) and CyclOSM (https://www.cyclosm.org). Both are free to use and useful regardless of the type of bike one is using.

 

Copyright being used to protect the rich & powerful, who are the main beneficiaries of IP legislation.

 

Despite them not being physically in the US, not having operations in the US, and not selling the books. Just normal world police BS.

 

Windows once again fails at security despite convoluted attempt

 

Debian to automatically load non-free [libre] firmware but inform users it is doing so. IMO a compromise to broaden hardware support.

 

Copyright holders mad about online library. (I doubt they like physical libraries either).

 

In the developed world (esp. the US), the hammer and sickle, symbols of labor, are not actually used that widely anymore. Industrial monocrop mechanised agriculture and assembly-line manufacturing processes, as well as the use of robotics means most workers are no longer swinging a hammer or sickle as they produce goods, such as food, for the society. tl;dr: As manual labor has changed in the US & developed countries, does this well-recognized Communist symbol need updating?

 

Like Soviet Union, PRC, DPRK, Viet Nam? From my understanding these weren't/aren't really ruled by the people but by a wealth(ier) elite, they use systems of money, have (limited) private property, etc.

Which, imo, is capitalism or (its friendlier variant) socialism (which has some communist features like universal healthcare for example), but is not communism.

Isn't the goal of communism supposed to be anarchist communism (no state [government], also no rich/poor divide)? Where nothing is owned, either by the state or by individuals?

I didn't think statism is compatible with communism.

view more: next ›