buckwheat

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes, they are. Source: scientific consensus.

Consider the following phylogeny of the primates: phylogeny of the primates. If we choose to exclude all non-simian primates from monkeyhood, you still cannot create a scientifically valid monophyletic grouping of monkeys that doesn't include the apes (hominoidae) without excluding the new world monkeys (platyrrhini). This is because the two main groups of monkeys, the platyrrhini and the catarrhini, split before the catarrhine simians split between the tailless old world monkeys (hominoidae) and the tailed old world monkeys (cercopithecoidae). If you told any primatologist, any biologist in general, any person on the street even, that howler monkeys and spider monkeys are not actually monkeys, you would rightly face raucous laughter and bemused derision. At this point, we have to address the elephant in the room that is the arbitrary delineation between monkey and ape based on tailedness. If we are to divide the apes from the monkeys solely on the basis of appearance, then why not cleave the hyraxes from their elephant and manatee cousins and graft them onto the rodents they so closely resemble? Why not call tuataras lizards while denying snakes the same title? Why not just call dolphins a kind of shark, since they're both sharkish in shape and lack the scales of other fish? Why not just say birds aren't dinosaurs because they don't look like a brontosaurus? Because it's unscientific derangement, that's why. Paraphyletic groupings based on arbitrary physical markers is as against scientific consensus as it gets.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I AM THE STORM THAT IS APPROOOACHING

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

holy shit, it's morter from rick and morter

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Cladistically speaking, apes are in fact monkeys. Tail or no, you cannot create a phylogeny which includes all monkeys while excluding apes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry carnotaurus lovers, no hate to the OG, but this is abelisaurid perfection, nothing comes close to this top-of-the-heap homegrown theropod from the cultural center of earth, Madagascar. Nothing can match them. You know why Majungasaurus was a cannibal? Because no other animal comes close to being this good. There's a reason the KT extinction event happened right after this guy disappeared; God himself, in the heavens, realized nothing could possibly evolve to be better than Majungasaurus, it doesn't get better than this, so might as well pull the plug and save us all the effort.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

here comes another chinese earthquake

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Can we follow that logic to assume they had Who vikings, going around Whourope Seussically pillaging Whonasteries and Whollages and whimsically blood eagling Who peasants?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

RED AND BLACK I DRESS

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

based Gaddafi, at it again with the most asinine and inflammatory takes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

eyy nice, enjoy settin up the goblins for the little wizard guys to smack, I know I do

view more: ‹ prev next ›