cwood

joined 1 year ago
 

This seems to have been overshadowed by election news. For context, this area is in the downtown business core and is perpetually busy with foot traffic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I can't tell which of these profits are in actual currency and which are in fake money.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

As usual, the business fundamentals thing happens after the compensation has been paid out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I'm getting the picture that governance is a great thing until you find out that other people want to govern you back.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The encouragement of a situation where you disconnect with those outside, the sleep deprivation, the drip of hints that you're not meeting the standard, the trust in the great leader.

It also sounds corporate, yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

You know how sometimes you use a grocery app and it's fairly obvious that the people writing them don't spend time in grocery stores? I'm getting that same impression here.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Imagine being a skilled San Francisco-style tech worker, at the apex of your industry, and the heights of intellect and rigor you can scale outside of that very specific context turn out to be "race science" apologia. Probably a lesson in there somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

To your edit, there do seem to be very many people emotionally invested in append-only ledger technology.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Weird, I thought that policies such as improving the uptake of asset-backed commercial paper(1), loosening restrictions on beneficial owner(2) anonymity in shell corporations(3), and even protecting network marketing(4) companies from innovation-unfriendly regulations would be far bigger vote getters than this.

 

There's so much material here. Do we have a buzzword bingo card for this board?

Original link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/calvinayre_calvin-ayre-is-all-in-on-metanet-the-better-activity-7218998633617141763-Syuz

Archive link: https://archive.is/VD7Yn

There's video! And an article! On his own site: https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-is-all-in-on-metanet-the-better-more-inclusive-and-dynamic-internet-video/

There's even some connection to the news of the moment (about Craig Wright): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin_Ayre#Bitcoin_involvement

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Even just saying it was mescaline would help it make more sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm starting to think that some writing classes would really help the EA/LR crowd.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is there some EA culture thing where every thought has to be expanded into essay form?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Now is that number total in actual money or in fake internet money?

 

Of course young optimistic me would have considered that this was an easy thing to have a QA test for, but here we are in 2024 and I am neither young or optimistic. Maybe the AI QA folks were in the last few rounds of Google layoffs or something.

 

A Toronto-area recuiter has mentioned a suprising amount of money for what appears to be a run of the mill cloud-aware ops job.

Berachain offers generous salaries ($400k) as well as STRONG Token Equity Packages ($300k p.a.) and amazing team culture, with an office based in Toronto

(Obvious answer is that the actual offer is lower, of course.)

I'm figuring the catch is something less obvious than:

Assuming for this post that this was a $400,000 salary with the usual corporate addons, how would somebody go about finding the catch that the salary is the red flag for?

view more: next ›