[-] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

We have found that the best way to store bread to maintain the nice texture and consistency is to leave it on a wooden board with the sliced side downwards. The crust seems to protect the inner part well without turning the bread too moist.

Seems counterintuitive, but just leaving it like that on the counter lets the bread stay nice for more than a week.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago

Jars of stuff which expired years or even decades ago. They still do.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

So it protects official acts without actually specifying what an official act is. If incitement of insurrection is an official act, it seems like the definition is quite broad.

[-] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago

That sounds both crazy and not actually wildly far fetched. If the tables were turned and Trump was in the position of having the power to declare Biden's movement as an enemy and carry out violent ways to stop them, I would almost expect it to happen.

448
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don't see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.

I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don't want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it's actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.

What am I missing?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Just to make sure to not take sides, I pronounce the 'g' as in 'design'

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

"Only at least 15%"

As in one could expect the study to yield a higher low bound.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

If she didn't bring a rotisserie chicken, that hat is definitely too big. But if she thought of bringing one, her brain is so large that it wouldn't leave any room for the chicken.

That hat is a real Catch 22.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, it's not like I'm yielding. The point is that I find them to be detractors rather than attractors to join our common goal of not eliminating ourselves.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago

I still subscribe to the theory that these people are hired actors from Big Oil. They are experts at being unlikable and naturally pushes me towards the opposing side. It sucks.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

But the post says "horse" not "house". You know, like the neigh-type of thing.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

A steadily increasing curve would always be above its average, no?

47
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I created an account on mastodon.social a few days ago. A day after creation, my account was suspended. My appeal was denied and no reason was given. So I assumed mastodon.social was not accepting new accounts, so I moved over to mastodon.online and created an account there. Today that account was suspended as well, again without reason. I didn't post anything from either account. My only actions were to follow a few people within tech.

Looking at previous posts here, people are laughing at complaints about difficulties of joining mastodon and pushing it away as a simple task. I have now attempted to join two of the highest suggested servers of mastodon and gotten suspended from both. I am uninterested in shotgunning servers until I find one which doesn't suspend me without reason.

How is the onboarding process of mastodon supposed to work if the top suggested servers are suspending new accounts without warning or reason?

view more: next ›

dQw4w9WgXcQ

joined 11 months ago