[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

*Except cheetahs.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

Sorry. Age gets us all! If it's any consolation, depending on when you started reading we may not be more than ~10-15 years apart. I remember the 2004 ones being new and I'm in my early thirties.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I've been reading them for something like 2/3 of my life based on the first one I remember reading new. I feel old.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

The OT god is firmly monolatristic, other gods canonically exist. The NT god is after Judaism transitioned to monotheism, so god had to change from less "my dad will beat up your dad" to more "god is responsible for everything so he's omnibenevolent but don't think about it too hard."

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

It's one of my favorite games ever, but I wouldn't say it's the best game ever made. I would say it's one of the most unique gaming experiences I've ever had though, and that's valuable to me. Learning about this cute little star system one mystery at a time is an incredible experience IMO. But if you're bored by the gameplay loop, don't expect it to change much. It stays pretty constant. The point is learning one secret at a time and getting a full picture of what's happening.

Flying is definitely clunky, but to me it feels intentional (or at least fitting). As others have said, always use auto-pilot to go between planets and cancel to move your trajectory around anything that comes in between and then re-engage auto pilot. Usually that's either the sun or a moon (happens a lot if you book it straight to Brittle Hollow). When you're near other things, match velocity is very useful either to stop next to something or get nice and aligned with the planet you're about to land on.

When flying manually, less is more. There's no friction to slow you down but there is gravity to speed you up.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's certainly more accurate than "Hispanic chef" which is just entirely wrong, but I still think that's not the best way to describe him. Do you have a source for his Mexican citizenship? I can't find it anywhere.

All I can find is basically a residential history. Born 1896 in Baveno, Italy; moved around a lot in the 1910s (Italy --> Montreal --> back to Italy --> Sacramento --> San Diego). As he moved around California he was involved in the restaurant business and eventually established restaurants in Tijuana to get around Prohibition. So that must have been early 1920s, then he eventually moved back to California in 1936 and stayed there (occasionally moving cities) until his death in 1956.

I think "Italian chef" is certainly the least ambiguous way to describe him. "Italian immigrant chef in Tijuana" is a bit of a mouthful.

Edit: honestly it's not even clear if he lived in Tijuana or still lived in San Diego and just worked in Tijuana (initially because of Prohibition). He got married in Santa Ana in 1924 (same year as the credited Caesar salad invention). His daughter was born in San Diego in 1928.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Well, not a Hispanic chef. An Italian chef living in Tijuana.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, all it takes is one cat who goes for it and you'd have to adjust. I just don't believe it's super common the way common wisdom on the internet suggests.

I also think the amount of other enrichment your cats get can deter this sort of "naughty" behavior. I see that as them trying to find something fun to do. If they have other outlets I would hypothesize they'd be less inclined towards this.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sheesh, now I feel actually attacked a little. I was being mostly hyperbolic, but you can do really useful things with complex figures in presentations. For example: revealing elements sequentially to build up to the final figure or altering opacity of different elements to bring the audience's attention to specific parts of the figure.

This sequencing can sometimes very subtly alter the size of the figure as you change elements, so the default positioning will slightly change from one slide to the next. Most people won't care or notice when a figure slightly drifts by a pixel or two during these sequences, but it bothers me tremendously so I add adjustments to keep every variation of the figure aligned on the slides.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Either I'm the luckiest person ever or this isn't as universal as everyone always makes it out to be. My house was always a multi-cat household growing up and I've got one cat of my own now. In total I've lived with 8 cats and my parents have had another 3 come in since I moved out. We have always aligned the toilet paper over and not once that I'm aware of did our cats ever unroll it.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I feel personally attacked. Brb, making presentation slides in beamer and compiling 1000 times to get the figure to the exact right pixel.

I definitely won't make any changes to the figure later that will make me have to adjust the position again. Why yes, this is better than PowerPoint, why do you ask?

6
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

doctordevice

joined 3 months ago