13
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/technology
14
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/technology
23
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/technology
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

so few devices are supported >?<

I don't agree with that, take a look at this:

Officially supported devices and the list of unofficial /e/ builds part1 and part2 (those might not be working as good as official builds)

348
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

some interesting excerpts:

The analysis notes that a government can easily tell when a person is using WhatsApp, in part because the data must pass through Meta’s readily identifiable corporate servers. A government agency can then unmask specific WhatsApp users by tracing their IP address, a unique number assigned to every connected device, to their internet or cellular service provider account.

The assessment makes clear that WhatsApp engineers grasp the severity of the problem, but also understand how difficult it might be to convince their company to fix it.

It will be difficult to better protect users against correlation attacks without making the app worse in other ways, the document explains. For a publicly traded giant like Meta, protecting at-risk users will collide with the company’s profit-driven mandate of making its software as accessible and widely used as possible.


“WhatsApp has no backdoors and we have no evidence of vulnerabilities in how WhatsApp works,” said Meta spokesperson Christina LoNigro.

That's why you slam e2e encryption banner all over the app to make this statement even more true instead of doing an independent code review that could confirmed that on paper.

14
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
42
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

On a different note, did anyone noticed a link to discussion on privacy, referencing this post (2x) on threema blog, see post: Chat Apps, Government Ties, and Transparency ?

PD, on the other hand ...

&

Then, PD chimed in

refs to this: --> https://lemmy.world/post/15169047

which was federated through .world but originally posted on ml.

rip rd

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

He/it? looks like a RoboCop, I wonder what's it seeing in that RoboCop visor on that bionic lookalike head?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Update: it's back, works differently now.

Aurora Store Changelog : v4.4.4 (58)

• Ability to export downloads to an external location

207
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
29
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

If you use mobile data only on your phones, and you update your apps by transferring apks through local connection (offline), bad news.

Saving to external storage is gone, and every single phone will need to download updates through Aurora separately, either by using up mobile data or connecting to WiFi.

On version 4.4.3 this feature is already gone.

Dev:

... both settings were dropped. I am open to patches if someone can implement it again using the documents API which is recommended by Android.

Source


If you know any app that can extract split apks, so that it can transferred and installed afterwards on another phone, please let me know. Thanks

view more: ‹ prev next ›

grid11

joined 3 months ago