hypelightfly

What abuse that “doesn’t rise to the level of illegality” gets kids seized by child protective agencies?

What else could it be?

tldr; "No I can't I made it up but I'll block you for pointing it out".

That's not a good example. Child endangerment is illegal, which is what your examples are.

You failed to provide an example. Feel free to do so along with a source.

Feel like providing a source that NYC is doing that? Because it appears to not be true as far as I can see.

That was sort of my point. I guess it would be better stated as putting the decision making at the individual level doesn't help, or something like that.

For me it's the star map and the lack of local map.

The planet maps are fine.

Yes, you did. That's the part I largely agreed with. The part I don't agree with is fiduciary funds obligations not being more complex than serving drinks in your cafeteria/restaurant.

Did you miss the first few words I wrote?

I largely agree with what your saying

What fiduciary obligations does a pension fund have that is somehow more complex, important, and forgivable vs obligations belonging to Pepsi Co?

I largely agree with what your saying but this part is ridiculous. The Finnish parliament has no obligations to serve/sell Pepsi. It's not an investment it was literally having the drink available. That's not at all comparable to the fiduciary duty of a pension fund.

I'm pretty sure that was your first comment.

I don't think you know what the word specifically means.