jwt

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal! You jumped into the ankle depth sprinkle pool which now has to be washed and sterilized, so you get nothing! You lose! Good day, sir!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (4 children)

*Sigh*, Kid Rock is about to shoot some holes in donuts, isn't he?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I heard they also want to introduce a new month: Auguary

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Defiantly definitely works too ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

They're very good at making up things!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, everyone knows the new standard will be whatever gets the backing of the porn industry.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know the kind of research result where you go: "Well, no shit sherlock!" ?

This is the diametrical opposite of that...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I fail to see how one impedes the other, in fact I would argue it would help her win

Okay, give me an argument why setting Fox straight will help her win the election, because just saying so isn't an argument. I'd argue that time spent bickering 'with Fox about Fox' isn't time spent getting people that wouldn't otherwise vote for her, to vote for her. (and that, by the way, is how one impedes the other)

Why hide?

Nobody said she should hide.

You think any Fox News fanboys would be swayed by anything Kamala says?

And this is the main point: Yes actually. If she makes salient points about matters that are dear to them, something is going to gnaw eventually. Have you seen Bernie Sanders' appearances on the network? The audience definitely seems to be on his hand some of the time, just because he points out that what they have been told on the network isn't making sense. It can be done. A bunch of them are a lost cause for sure, but certainly she ought to be able to get some of them to vote for her, she running against Trump (for fox sake!).

Her time would be better spent attracting unregistered voters

Agreed 100%, those also watch Fox though. And Trump spouting his garbage freely on that channel without opposing voices will not make them vote for Harris.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

No, what she needs to do is win this election. That's her job, everything else (like taking entertainment corpos to task for their shady tactics) comes secondary right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

While entertaining for us, I don't think that'd be a wise reaction. If she wants to win, she probably also needs to sway some people that are lifetime FOX junkies. Such a reaction could have a 'basket of deplorables' effect (being the stone cold truth, but hardly effective)

view more: ‹ prev next ›