Strongly agree but lots keep using X, in fact it seems to get worse :(
Here's a take by a Mozilla employee :
- Mozilla has been ad funded since 2005
- Browser development is not sustainable by just donations
- Transparency is most important
I did lots of reading about this and am still wondering why someone would want to opt for catch-all domains over aliases. Catch-alls seem highly susceptible to spam and while I haven’t actually done any email aliasing yet,
I'm using catch-all since years and no spammer has ever made up a new email alias to spam me.
it doesn’t seem to take much effort to make a new alias if you have a plan with unlimited aliases.
That depends. The moment you are in a shop without your phone/email and they really want an email address you can simply write down their_company_name@your_email_domain_name for them without having to compromise anything.
It will remain only on the LAN without being reachable from the internet, does the “not https” aka “personal certificate” will be a problem?
Caddy can do local SSL certificates without needing browser exceptions.
- https://www.freshports.org/www/caddy/ : Fully-managed local CA for internal names and IPs
- https://caddyserver.com/docs/automatic-https#local-https
- https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/admin/reverse-proxy/#caddy
-
28 juli 2014 — What do you think about Linus Torvalds? I met Linus and his wife briefly at a party in 1999, and haven't crossed paths since.
-
Video with Linus giving RMS the Torvalds award in 1999 : https://youtube.com/watch?v=xnb_eFSnXFI
openshot kdenlive shotcut flowblade pitivin
The web link in this post gives a 404. Correct is https://sga.codeberg.page/articles/Launcher/Launcher_for_Everything.html
I think to know that you can query some info from a mailserver to test if an address exists.
Yes, vrfy
- https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/vrfydmn/vrfydmn.8.en.html
- https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/jammy/man1/vrfy.1.html
- https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/postfix-the-definitive/0596002122/re29.html
For Postfix the default of disable_vrfy_command is : no So I assume you can try it risk free.
I'm cheering this on among others because the shadow-banned person wrote something important about a sick EU law proposal that tried to break E2EE.