mke

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And to make matters more complicated,

  • Servo, as far I know, has no plans to be a browser. Instead, they want to offer an alternative to Blink (the Chrome rendering engine), so that other software can be made with it. This seems to a common misconception.
  • Ladybird's project lead and main developer, Andreas Kling, may or may not hold controversial views that some would prefer to avoid supporting.

I really want there to be more options in the browser market that aren't Blink based (or WebKit, sorry Apple), but the situation's tough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can probably force it to be by using a custom extension list, but the result might not be functional or pretty to look at.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't think so. As far as context switching goes, tab groups are faster and, having used both Chrome's tab groups and Firefox's bookmarks, I'd argue they're easier to manage too.

The way I see it, each feature has different intended uses. Ideally, I wouldn't use tab groups as a bookmarks substitute either... but sometimes it happens due to their advantages.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Small addendum, I believe having an unfair monopoly is actually illegal in the US. Google search is currently on the hook for this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Using bookmarks as a substitute for tab groups is a very different user experience, though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They might simply prefer it, or be in an environment where they have no choice (e.g. office, education).

I'm a stubborn Firefox user but I have to say, this feels a little aggressive and not at all likely to convince anyone to switch.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I thought that might've been the source of your misunderstanding. Sorry, that's just how I write sometimes, no deeper meaning intended. As far as I know there's no public data on what percentage of Firefox and Chrome users like their browsers' features.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

(because of Brave's whole thing)

Ha.

I'm sorry to hear that, been there (Chrome, Opera, Vivaldi, Firefox in my case). Hopefully we can stick around for a while.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Leaving Vivaldi was a sad moment for me. That UI, that sidebar, the settings, those features...! Goodness. I'm an avid enjoyer of bells and whistles, and Vivaldi's got all of them and then some. I miss that a bit.

The folks working on it seem great, check their blog for their decision track record 1 2 3. Did you know they also host a mastodon instance? Literally my only issue with it is the engine, and that just so unluckily happens to be a deal breaker.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A lot of people don't even know it's an option, or have grown to believe that's just how the web is. When was the last time you saw adblockers in mainstream media or news?

This is why I think it's so important to keep raising awareness. If you have people in your life who you believe would be better off using uBlock, consider bringing it up when you have the opportunity.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I thought about mentioning that. But the comparison goes both ways. Less than 1% of Chrome users switching to Firefox could still mean an increase in Firefox users of over 10%, if I remember my numbers correctly. That'd be a sweet boost for most products.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

No. I simply meant that there exist Chrome users who appreciate what it provides them (features, UI, etc), so for these users to leave they'd have to give up those things. That's always a hard ask.

view more: ‹ prev next ›