[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Sounds very familiar..

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

That's an optimistic answer. But I'll take it. There's not much optimism around lately.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm not sure what your argument is. I've been working with pedophiles for 10+ years in the past. I'm curious about how society creates and identifies its "monsters", that's all. Not sure you're on topic.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe that's the reason. At least that's what I tend to think. But at the same time, it the rise of pedophilia to the prime type of deviancy looks quite.. recent, if I may say? So something is society may have changed in the last decades/century to make it so?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Food for thought indeed, thanks.

23
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Why do it seems that pedophilia is, nowadays, percieved as the most vicious crime, along with terrorism? Why not, for example, sexual assault?

I mean it as an actual question, but first I should clarify my intent :

-I'm not advocating for normalizing pedophilia

-I have been a victim of it myself. Luckily, I've mostly recovered from it and live a happy life.

-Because of my political commitments, which are totally unrelated to this question, I've met some old people from the 70s who advocated for the depenalization of consensual sex between minors and adults (if such a thing exist, which can legitimately be doubted).

-I'm friend with one of them but I could never understand how that idea came to their minds. She knows I oppose the very idea. But it got me curious.

What I want to ask is, what, in contemporary history, contributed to make pedophilia the #1 vicious crime, surpassing rape in most consciences (if I'm not mistaken), in your opinion?

Feel free to delete this if that's not acceptable. Also, I didn't include the word "pedophilia" in the title to avoid triggering people who may have such experiences.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly, I'll vote for them. But they disgust me with all their power struggle about who's going to be prime minister. In doing so, they're tearing apart the whole thing. They swore that they wouldn't betray us. They're betraying us everyday by showing everybody it's just a struggle between egos. They're paving the way for the far right too with this ridiculous display of inflated heads.

I'll vote for them, then I'll puke. The only frontliner I'm feeling like supporting in the future is, maybe, Manon Aubry.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

France is becoming a far right country on two weeks. Do yourself a favor and stay as far as you can.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I know it exists, but I'm so happy to buy a game I've played and finish. Pyre, Transistor, A story beside and so many others. Just as a "Thank you".

P. S. : of you people didn't know about it, check A Story Beside. One of the games I'll never forget.

5
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Poto sérieux change de code

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Empirical evidence wins out in the end but... it's not that simple. One name said a lot about this : Thomas Kuhn. Try giving The structure of scientific revolutions a read whenever you can. It's old and there are more contemporary work, but Kuhn is still a reference in epistemology.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

You learn something everyday. My knee-jerk reaction : such a shame to mutilate pets so they look like what we want..

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, people really do that?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I literally agree with you and you're arguing with me. That's.. awkward.

427
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
117
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Well, as a guy, I've been asked multiple times why I systematically play games female characters in video games, to the point of skipping a game if I'm forced to pay a male one, with a few exceptions (I really liked Albus from Troubleshooters for example). Whenever there's romance in a game, I'll also take the F/F route. Yet, I don't think I fetishize those in general. There's a thing about not liking most M characters in games, but also something about playing someone really different from who I am. We've had an interesting conversation about this with my gf who always plays F characters and woyd never play M.

Although I'm a straight guy, I've always more identified to female friends and characters, although I have a few male friends too. So I'm wondering who else does that (playing a character not matching your gender), and if you found your own explanation.

Edit : It's not really an oversexualization drive for me, I try to play a female character that looks like me, even though I've never thought about actually becoming a woman.

Edit 2 : So far, I think we have, hmm..

  1. Playing someone that differs from one's irl identity
  2. Physical Attractivity
  3. Male character writing and design
  4. Lara Croft effect
  5. Lady Dwarf
351
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
52
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

As per title. This is such a great feature, included by Eternity, Sync, Connect and a few others. A very nice QoL which a few users desperately want in their app. I'm one of them! Good luck with the development of Boost!

2
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Mine is quite certainly "I have striven not to laugh at human actions, not to weep at them, nor to hate them, but to understand them".

6
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A community for those interested in ethics and particularly about the work on Spinoza. Anyone is welcome, you don't need a degree. Gatekeeping is not allowed.

If you are curious or want to share you examples, memes, discussions about how Spinoza's Ethics are relevant to you, of if you're curious and just want to learn a thing or two about it, come and discuss!

[email protected]

2
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

For me it was through Deleuze's course on Spinoza. Stumbled upon it. Thought "well, idk anything about this, I might as well listen to it in the background while playing Warframe".

I ended up.. not playing a lot of Warframe..

1
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I've been thinking about writing this following a discussion on atheistmemes because it gave me a lot to think about.

The idea is quite simple. I acknowledge there are multiple visions of atheism but never really took the opportunity to discuss it with people.

So here are the main cornerstones of my vision of atheism. Do you share them or reject them ?

-Gods, as religions define it, do not exist. There might be some kind of metaphysical supreme entity, but it would be more akin to an abstraction.

-Spiritual beliefs, per se, are not a good or bad thing. I admire quite a lot of religious minded people. Abolitionist quakers, anarchist christians, muslim thinkers, poets, activists fighting for emancipation from colonial/theocratic rule, etc. That being said, I believe I'll live and die as an atheist.

-Religious institutions are quasi-inherently evil. I write "quasi-" because I don't know enough about all beliefs system. What about animist/pantheist institutions ? I don't know. I come from a family of African immigrants and I hear mixed things about those.

-Being an atheist do not make you better or worse than being a believer, and, quite importantly, not "wiser". Wisdom is earned from character and mind. That being said, being a fundamentalist and being wise are mutually incompatible imo.

-I deeply hate and resent all missionaries. Religious ones, especially fundamentalism of all shapes and forms, for sure, but also atheist ones. I believe there's no god, I don't need my friends to accept this. If they want to learn about atheism, I'll tell them. I often question them about religion, because I sometimes have trouble understanding how they can be great people while believing in what are basically myths to me. But that's all. That's just me who don't understand. I don't think they would be "better" as atheists.

-I have an ambiguous relation to Islam. While I reject it as a set of institutions, like all other religions, and absolutely despise it's fundamentalist current, I do understand that some large part of anti-Islam movements are actually ethnoracists in (a bad) disguise. I tend to favour alliances with muslim individuals/groups i'll be able to talk with without it being infuriating. Tbh, the only fundamentalists I actually talked with irl were Christians and Jews. But that's just my social position. If I was born in another context, another place, another family, it who would be different. I don't doubt all religions produce fundamentalism in a somehow equal measure.

-I truly think reason is not a quality which is restricted to atheism. Even if, like wisdom, I think some conceptions of religion bar people from living according to reason. But I can't respect people waving the "reason" flag like a title, an honor or an automatic consequence to being an atheist. Reason is a way of life, certainly not an authoritarian one, it's hard earned and always fragile. And it's certainly not restricted to "maths". Although mathematics are a part of it. Understanding what's good and bad for your own complexion is, for me, the beating heart of reason. Easier said than done.

-Despite all I said, I understand and won't criticize a very strong stance against any religion from someone who's been oppressed by them. Although, and take it with a grain of salt because it's only my experience of those people, I don't feel like they're the first ones to wave atheist as the flag of a nation or a pride backed by a superiority complex.

To end this wall of text, here's a summed up version of how I was raised. My parents are far from perfect, but this they did fine.

Both were religious. Jewish and Muslim, with various degrees of adhesion/rejection/deviation from their faiths (quite complicated for my mother). They had us participate in both religious rituals when we were young. We sang prayers (as we sang folk songs, we didn't make a difference). But they didn't give us any kind of religious education. When we were 14 or 15, they gathered my siblings and I and basically told us this :

"We are religious. But that's just us. You've experienced what is religion. You should make a choice about it. Either now or later. There will be no consequence to your choice under this roof."

There were three of us. We all choose to be atheists. They acknowledged our choice add we never once discussed that again.

That's it. I'd like to hear your opinions about all this, if any. Thanks for reading !

Edits : typos

10
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Well ironically, sorry if it has been posted already (and I think so), because I'm currently using an app which allows to hide posts on scroll. That's the only important feature liftoff is missing imo and I hope you'll consider it !

That being said, the app is wonderful. Good job !

426
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

needthosepylons

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF