nul

When you're here, you're ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ʟᴇᴀᴠɪɴɢ.

Does it count if I give a proof reducing the entire universe down to a 2-dimensional construct?

You're not planning to eat the rest of those french fries, are you? I'll just help you throw those out. No no, I've got it from here. No need for any more involvement from you.

I'm the bus.

The US is developing? That's great news!

Did some Googling. Apparently it's nutritional supplements:

https://5percentnutrition.com/

This one:

https://lemmy.ml/post/16995334

I'm not hiding because I enjoy the compliments... I just really don't want to be spotted, okay?

That sounds super interesting! Can't read it until I get home (am on vacation at Disneyland right now) but in about a week's time I hope you don't mind if I reply with my updated understanding, and maybe a question or two.

I made a comment a while back (on my alt account) about how the origin of the universe can be expressed as a simple formula: https://sopuli.xyz/comment/3303086

So, I'm curious if that viewpoint will shift at all with a better understanding of electron positron interactions. It kind of makes sense to me that the universe and the antiverse are stacked on top of each other but with time pointing in opposite directions. But I'm sure I'm oversimplifying Feynman's theory and I'll have to read his reasoning to really understand.

Not in the current standard model, for sure. Or is there a reason empirically why they simply can't be.

~240,000 micro & nanoplastic pieces in one liter of plastic-bottled water.

Mfw I read this while drinking a liter of plastic-bottled water: 😮‍💨

For the people downvoting, may I hear a counterpoint as to why this wouldn't make sense?