[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

It’s an act of goodwill for all developers.

You’re free to believe it’s a simple black/white “us vs them” issue, but I choose to see the world as more nuanced then that.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Why not?
I’ve been in situations where I couldn’t release the code to a project, but I was able to use some decent libraries because they were MIT licensed.
So I’m happy to do the same for libraries I write so that others in similar situations could also receive the same benefit I did.
I see it as an act of public goodwill, like paying it forward for the times you can’t directly contribute to another project.

Just my personal view on it, anyway.
I’m not claiming it’s a bulletproof solution or that it isn’t open to being ‘abused’.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You meant walk, right? Right?????

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Do people wake up before 7am?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

There are some cases where it’s just not possible to release the source code, even if you wanted to.

For example, if you’re developing a Nintendo switch game, you aren’t allowed to release any code that uses Nintendo’s sdk, so that means you also can’t use any copyleft libraries.

Maybe MPL-licensed libraries would be ok though. Idk, I’m not a lawyer.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It originally started as just a fun side project.
But even if it hadn’t, are you suggesting we should no longer start big/community projects in C++?

Picking an unsafe language has the added benefit of distancing yourself from the toxic rust-or-die crowd, who can’t seem to mind their own damn business.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I just don’t think it’s fair to tell somebody with over 20 years of experience with C++ that their decision to use C++ in their next project is a ‘fail’.

Learning a new language will probably not be faster than using one you’re already deeply familiar with.

I’m not sure why you’re asking me about the merits of C++ over rust, that wasn’t my point. I was simply advocating for personal choice.

Also, my first sentence was literally praising rust, but I guess I didn’t deepthroat it enough for you to notice? Presumably because you’ve taken the thought of somebody advocating for anything other than rust as a personal attack.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Rust is great, but anybody developing something should have the ability to choose whatever programming language they prefer. If you want it made with rust, make it yourself.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Huh? I’m just talking about rice crackers. Maybe reading really isn’t for you

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

‘tis good shit

view more: next ›

phlegmy

joined 2 weeks ago