poki

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thanks for pointing that out!

Bazzite also includes an entry in their documentation in which they explain how theming on Bazzite works exactly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

FWIW, by creating your own images (through BlueBuild or tooling offered by uBlue) you could bake themes directly into those folders.

However, I totally understand why you'd not feel compelled to do as such πŸ˜…. Especially if your current distro/system works splendidly.

Sometimes, placing it to ~/.local/share/themes works as well*.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (15 children)

Fair.

Btw, was I correct on the following?

I assume this is based on an experience with Kinoite? Am I right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Thank you for the answer and for your time! I wish you a nice day!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (23 children)

Thank you for the reply!

Inconvenient package management

Fair.

manual theme installation

I assume this is based on an experience with Kinoite? Am I right?

anything that involves changes to the system

I'd argue "anything" is too harsh. But yes, there are definitely edge cases that are either very/too cumbersome or outright impossible to achieve on Fedora Atomic.

However, I'd argue that while the associated paradigm shift and learning curve do require some commitment to adjust to, it is a more sane way of running a system for most people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Thank you for mentioning that! Did the slower distros you tested come with older kernels?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (28 children)

I can’t fully agree with you about the smooth user experience on this particular distro because it’s immutable

Could you elaborate on why you think this is the case? FYI, I've been using Fedora Atomic for over two years. So, please don't feel the need to explain me how it works*.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

So..., you don't think it will make a difference. However, you do affirm that whatever CachyOS does is noticably better than the rest.

Perhaps more importantly, have you actually measured 1% lows or 0.1% lows on games. And did you compare how different distros fared in this regard?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

TLE did a performance test on this distro and it was pretty much the same in terms of FPS as other distros.

Without measuring any 1% lows or 0.1% lows.

I enjoy TLE's content, but that video is far from exhaustive on this.

Unless a better comparison comes out, we should reserve ourselves from making any judgements on this particular subject.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Definitely one of the better answers I've received so far. Thank you for that. However, I feel as if the following part reveals that it's not as 'protected' as I'd like:

It also doesn’t protect you if someone gets root access to your device through other remote means.

Though, at this point, I've somewhat accepted that I'm seeking a software solution for a hardware problem. Hence, the impossibility of my query... I hope I'm wrong and perhaps you can point me towards the solution I'm seeking. However, if that's not the case, then I would like you to know that I appreciate your comment. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This seems like a very complicated way to achieve your goal! It sounds like sitting yourself down and giving you a stern talking to might be a beter aporoach.

You're probably right. But, it ensures a surefire method if accomplished.

Having said that, if you have these very important files that you don't want to lose, please make sure they're backed up somewhere off of your machine. Storage fails, and it's a horrible feeling losing something important. Unfortunately doing so would defeat the approach you're thinking of.

Thank you for your concerns!

This might be a case of needing to reframe the question to get to the cause of the issue, and then solve that.

Makes sense.

So, why do you want to make it hard to reinstall your machine?

I want to set it up in a particular way to ensure maximum productivity. But I'm afraid that I'll not go through with it (as has happened a lot in the past). Thus, making it impossible to reinstall should enable me to go through. As I wouldn't have any other choice.

Is it the amount of time you spend on it

The amount of time spent unproductively. Yes.

the chance of screwing it up

Nope. I haven't had a serious breakage since over one and a half years. I think I'm managing splendidly.

needing it working

Don't really have particular problems related to keeping my system up and running.

has it become a compulsion or something else?

Not sure what you meant with this.

Maybe if we can get to the root of the issue we can find a solution.

I believe I touched upon this earlier in this comment. I just want to be very productive.

With regard to TPM, it's basically just a key store, so you can use it fir anything really, althought it's normally used by generating a TPM key and using it to encrypt the key that's actually used to encrypt your data, storing the encrypted key with the OS. Just reinstalling won't wipe the TPM, but unless you made an effort to save the encrypted key it'll be gone. Given your problem statement above it just adds to the data you'd need to save, which isn't helpful.

Uhmm..., I feel as if I should properly read up on this. Have you got any pointers you would recommend?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

πŸ˜…. It's a requirement that the data stays on the same drive that I run my system from.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί