quirzle

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I got ya. I'm agreeing that he's a coward and an idiot, but disagreeing that he might not have been trying to murder a guy. He might not have believed it was murder, because of the idiot part...but the video convinced me he was intentionally trying to kill the unarmed man in the back of his car.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

At an active threat, sure. When the dude's been searched, handcuffed, and trapped in the back of a car...there's some personal responsibility, imo.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Would just be an idiot and a coward trying to kill a man.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago (9 children)

You don't mag dump like that if you don't care. He very much was trying to kill him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

like we’ve learned absolutely nothing from the experience

We've learned a lot, it's just what we've learned is about the nature of our employers and our value to them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

vSphere was never available in the free tier.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

No human would be dumb enough to park there.

There's at least 3 other cars parked there clearly visible in the videos.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The reality is that nobody's learning much useful from Free ESXi, as you need vCenter for any of the good stuff. They want you using the eval license for that, which gives you the full experience but only for 60 days.

Still, there's a lot of folks running free ESXi in labs (home and otherwise) and other small environments that may need to expand at some point. They're killing a lot of good will and entry-level market saturation for what appears (to me at least) literally zero benefit. The paid software is the same, so they're not developing any less. And they weren't offering support with the free license anyway, so they're not saving anything there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I don't believe it was, based on the other cars present in the videos.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

Seems like the witnesses saw it differently.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/12/waymo-set-on-fire-sf/72567647007/

"They were putting out some rage for really no reason at all. They just wanted to vandalize something, and they did," witness Edwin Carungay told KGO-TV.

The witness told the outlet the Waymo was vandalized and set on fire by a big group of people.

"One young man jumped on the hood, and on the windshield.," Carungay told KGO. "That kind of started the whole melee."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

What about contacting them and telling them you'd like to place an order but won't be because of the long wait times (which should reflect in the apps if they're striking)? You can include a suggestion that they pay a fair wage to attract enough drivers to meet the demand they're failing to meet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Sure, if you're willing to count my house as a "fence," otherwise the same logic would make you liable if someone breaks into your house and drowns in your bathtub. Of course it's not likely at all, but if someone were to smash down your front door to commit suicide in your tub, nobody's going to argue that's your fault.

I'll agree that leaving a firearm laying in the open in your back yard should be criminally negligent though, so can get behind that much of the pool analogy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›