I think that comment has two readings:

1. The commenter potentially missed the point of the post a bit and saying good parenting helps because it means they get diagnosed sooner
2. The commenter is saying that the abusive behaviours listed in the post count as "good parenting"

I can see why the second might get reported.

The stars and planets, yes, but there is a lot of very diffuse gas that does collide

Fluorescent lighting 100%. Warm dimming LEDs behind a nice shade, on the other hand, can stay (preferably dimmed).

My personal idea/hope is that there is some other dimension of spacetime over which the big bang had directionality, emitting matter and antimatter across different poles, and that's why. That'd also mean there's an anti-universe, which is why I like the idea.

In terms of the galaxies, I believe there's enough of an observable difference that I think we would be able to detect antimatter clusters, or similar, based on emission lines but I'm not 100% on that. Huge annihilation events from colliding galaxies and clusters would have massive energy signatures unlike anything else but the frequency of this would determine how likely it would be to see the evidence.

Oops responded to the wrong comment

That's what we genuinely don't know. Based on the standard model, it should be in equal parts.

I tried PCAPdroid recently and that seemed good

Glad I could help! I wasn't sure if I was missing something in what you were trying to do - I get that in some cases folding in those features can make things a lot easier.

Don't really understand why you're overriding __new__. Surely it'd work better to use:

def __init__(self, source: str | Path, *args: Any) -> None:
        super().__init__(Path(source, *args).expanduser().resolve())

But this removes self.__source and the property. I'm not sure what the advantage of using that is but you could always set that before the line super().__init__(Path(source, *args).expanduser().resolve()).

EDIT: if I've completely misunderstood, please could you explain? I don't really understand what subclassing is trying to achieve here, other than simplifying access to certain os.path functions.

The actual article says that the new thing is that it allows consumers to revoke access to information after the fact.