sup

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There's no turning back now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for this

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's awesome news!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't get it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree, The Batman was amazing

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Live long and prosper

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for sharing. I've been doing up some reading to understand this better

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought you were kidding

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah I see, thank you so much for the explanation. That makes sense. I wasn't clear on the exact terms outlined in the Act.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I have a naïve question. Isn't this illegal in the first place as per the Health Act? How was it even under consideration and why wasn't this immediately shutdown?

So far all the coverage I've seen for similar cases is along the lines that "some clinics have been charging patients for preferential access to healthcare because of staff shortage" or something like that. The general vibe I've been getting is "Oh, hope they don't do this, it isn't right" instead of "They CAN'T do this".

If this is indeed illegal, why hasn't there been any aggressive takedowns as it would have been done for other crimes?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I am really interested in getting one, but I'm planning to hold off until the cameras improve and reach flagship levels. Right now, that's the only drawback, and the price of course.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›