supamanc

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I love how they say there are "tough decisions" to be made about benefits. You're going to cut benefits and cut taxes, same as you've been doing for the last 14 yrs, and any other time you had power. Why's it so tough? You should be really fucking good at it by now!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, there is a difference, but it's barely perceptible, therefore it makes no difference which one is picked. If you actually have a preference go with that one. Otherwise flip a coin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Wait, there are other protocols?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Also, bones are supposed to be the sacrificial weak point, to protect the high value organs from shock damage. Having indestructible bones would lead to fucked up internal organs and brain damage.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

God damn you, that's all I can read now 😂

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nah, we have already exploited everything that can be easily exploited. Look at the effort we need to get new oil or metal deposits. Humans 2.0 will struggle to build basic machinery.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The risk is not so much Threads having access to our data, but thst Threads, with millions of users and teams of full time devs, becomes the standard, allowing Meta to control the development of the open source protocol, and browbeating everyone into using their instance/version/servers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

What a pointless question though. Obviously in the context 'Nazi' means what it means NOW.

'Peadophiles should be locked up' 'ah but what if the definition of Peadophile changes to incorporate anyone who has sex??'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In addition to the reply from the other chap, I'd point out that UEFA bought charges against city with absolutely no credible evidence and tried to ban them from competition. So I don't see how one could reach the conclusion that city bribed them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What evidence do have for these well documented FFP failings?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You are correct, and the outcome of the hearing won't be known for a couple of years. However indications are that the PL is basing their charges on the Der Speigle documents (out of context, doctored emails stolen from MCFC and released by a convicteded fraudster and blackmailer). UEFA based their case on the same emails, and the CAS (European sporting appeal court) found that there was no veracity to them and no evidence of any wrong doing on MCFCs part, apart from non cooperation with UEFAs 'investigation'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

No they're not! They have the highest revenue in world football, and have one of the lowest 'net spends' (as useless as that metric is) of all the 'major teams' over the last 5 yrs. They are nowhere near failing FFP!

view more: ‹ prev next ›