It's a mind-shortcut taking piss out of the blatant centrist mindset of criticising the left and defending the right by saying shit like "you cannot censor people you disagree with!" while talking about people posting bonafide hate speech and mistaking it for freedom of speech.
Something something Popper's Paradox and Nazi Bar analogy.
Should have used Arch instead hon hon.
Voyager is fine, although Wef Wef is such a nice, unique name I actually love it a lot.
They could host a Lemmy/Kbin accounts, although I feel like Twitter will be their next choice, since it's algorithm-ridden and has a huge amount of people in it.
Considering his politics I'm not sure, he's more of a capitalist enabler.
I'd love to pet them with my tiny rat paws.
Absolutely based.
They don't exist, because everytime someone mistakes hate speech for free speech it turns the community into a giant cesspool.
You are, because the guy we are talking about literally chose the appeasement rhetoric. And that's pretty enlightement centrist-y.
Both sides are equally bad bullshit.
Where there's a whip...
There's a way!
But you do not disagree with someone doing or believing something. By defending transphobia you disagree with someone being one thing or the other. Because transphobia isn't based on disagreeing with what trans people are doing or believe in. It disagrees with their fundamental right to exist and wants to take it away. It's no different from racism or antisemitism.
That's the difference you seem to miss.
A common sight in hyperpoliticized world.