[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 minutes ago

And this is it: Many of those "AI will be so smart that it can solve these problems for us!" arguments refer to problems where having a "smart" enough solution isn't the problem... Getting people to care/notice/participate/get out of the way is.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

And no, no one really uses this or an ICE truck in a way that would require them to have one. Even people who haul shit in the back would usually do with a more sensible roofed vehicle, but that would be less "cool".

Wait, no one has a legitimate use case for a truck? Like transporting building materials and tools? Large furniture and appliances? People who live along an unpaved mountain road, or work somewhere similarly remote, like forestry? Towing fifth-wheel trailers? When it snows here, I'm stuck at home until someone with a truck comes by to plow... They have large dedicated snowplows for the highways and stuff, but for out-of-the-way residential streets, the city contracts private pickup truck owners with their own plows. I'm glad they're around.

Like don't get me wrong-- The majority of truck owners pretty much never do these things, and it's an extremely wasteful vanity display for them. That's bad. Most people who buy Cybertrucks will not be doing truck stuff with them. That's bad too.

But I think some people have a good reason to own a truck.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

My comment isn't anti-corporate or anti-work though...? It just isn't that strange that Google is more efficient at generating revenue (as dollars-per-kWh) than Finland is.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Opt-in is only meaningful if users can make an informed decision. I think explaining a system like PPA would be a difficult task. And most users complain a lot about these types of interruption.

In my opinion an easily discoverable opt-out option + blog posts and such were the right decision.

So you see, because the users can't meaningfully give informed consent, their consent is therefore uh... [checks notes] not necessary.

Bullshit. Everyone knows that it's because if you actually ask someone "do you want to be creepy tracked, less-creepy tracked, or not tracked?" they'll pick "not" every time.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

If your efficiency function is centered around revenue, then yeah, of course... No surprise that one of the world's most successful for-profit companies generates more profit per watt-hour than a nation, which encompasses all sorts of non-revenue-generating activity like running hospitals and keeping street lights on.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna rewrite this baboon in Rust.

[-] [email protected] 96 points 3 days ago

Okay but can you please explain how it is not for sits, given that it is unequivocally made of warm?

[-] [email protected] 50 points 3 days ago

Sounds like they've already got a POS, just higher up on the org chart.

[-] [email protected] 47 points 5 days ago

I think what annoys me most about "the "sonic hedgehog" example is that it has nothing to do with sound.

There are two wolves in my heart: A meme wolf, and a pedant wolf. Today they fight, and I know not which will win.

30
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I keep interacting with systems-- like my bank, etc.-- that require (or allow) you to add one or more trusted devices, which facilitate authentication in a variety of ways.

Some services let you set any device as a trusted device-- Macbook, desktop, phone, tablet, whatever. But many-- again, like my bank-- only allow you to trust a mobile device. Login confirmation is on a mobile device. Transaction confirmation: mobile device. Change a setting: Believe it or not, confirm on mobile device.

That kind of makes sense in that confirming on a second device is more secure... That's one way to implement MFA. But of course, the inverse is not true: If I'm using the mobile app, there's no need to confirm my transactions on desktop or any other second device, and in fact, I'm not allowed to.

But... Personally, I trust my mobile device much less than my desktop. I feel like I'm more likely to lose it or have it compromised in some way, and I feel like I have less visibility and control into what's running on it and how it's secured. I still think it's fairly trustworthy, but just not categorically better than my Macbook.

So maybe I'm missing something: Is there some reason that an Android/iOS device would be inherently more secure than a laptop? Is it laziness on the part of (e.g.) my bank? Or is something else driving this phenomenon?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Rockity rock and stone!

[-] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago

They should make the versions UUIDs instead of integers so that we don't make assumptions about their ordinal relationships.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago

It talks extensively about On Bullshit, lol.

289
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

👀🍿

19
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I'm planning to open a new chequing account in the near future, and I'm contemplating bailing on RBC. I've been with them for a very long time, and one possible outcome is that I'll just open a new RBC account and be done with it. That'd be... fine.

But for a variety of reasons (including my satisfaction with RBC trending steadily downward), I'm thinking about opening this new account elsewhere. I don't have a ton of hard requirements, and I'm not really sure what to look for in a bank, but the following would be nice:

  • Good online banking experience, particularly desktop (RBC is shockingly bad at this)
  • Good credit card; easy to make payments from the new account
  • Minimal fees
  • Easy e-transfers
  • Real security (another thing RBC is terrible at)
  • Neat rewards would be cool
  • Low-fee, low-friction investing would also be cool-- I don't really do much investing, but I'd like to be able to

Any suggestions would be great, including anti-suggestions if you happen to know of a bank that I should avoid.

576
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Sure Todd, lol

286
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

For reference (as per Wikipedia):

Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure.

— Melvin E. Conway

Imagine interpreting that as advice on how you should try to design things, lol.

Tbf, I think most of the post is just typical LinkedIn fluff, but I didn't want to take the poor fellow out of context.

view more: next ›

thanks_shakey_snake

joined 1 year ago