toastal

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Only 128 characters? You’re gonna have issues converting everything to ASCII when you can’t even write “café”.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Git is distributed but still centralized. D in DVCS is distributed. Downvoters likely have never used a non-Git VCS, let alone a non-snapshot-based VCS. But fanboys will fanboy.

Pijul & Darcs are based on Patch Theory which make the conflicts of different patch order a non-issue so long as the apply cleanly (such as working on different ports of the code base). Patch A then patch B ≡ patch B then patch A; this will be a needless merge conflict in Git since the order matters. (& no, Jujutsu isn’t the solution still shackled to the limitations of Git as a back-end while claiming to do what Pijul does—but doesn’t).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This time. If the maker refused, Nintendo would have just told Microsoft to take it down & it would have happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Darcs & Pijul are based on Patch Theory. https://darcs.net/Theory

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anyway it is a good habit to avoid github entirely ~~(when hosting a repo)~~.

FIFY

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A “hub” implies centralization, no?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Water dries quickly. No need to overthink.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Reminder: don’t put your code on a corporate-owned code forge like Microsoft GitHub. That corporation is interested in helping other corporations like what happened with youtube-dl, et al. so don’t be surprised if your code get censored, or they aide in DCMAs (not to mention locking all of your communications & contributions to a proprietary platform that blocks users based on US sanctions). Use a nonprofit, or better, self-host your code forge—& set up mirrors to be resilient.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not Hot n Ready tho… pony up for the deep dish

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Thatcher-roofed cottages

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

FxOS only targeting low–mid-range phones in developing markets only seemed a bit odd. Basically no one had heard of it & these places largely choose used/old version of premium products to buying budget unless they have to. There was hype in the dev community about getting a B2G device, but there was hardly availability & specs were abysmal for an OS running a non-fast interpreted language like JavaScript. Not only that but the marketing was around openness & developer-friendliness—things average consumers don’t care about (even if they should).

Imagine in a parallel universe where the idea was managed properly & B2G left the phone sphere too—where school kids were required to get a FxBook instead of Chromebooks… 😶

view more: ‹ prev next ›