"I mean outside of the areas that are documented by people that work, it is impossible."

You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly.

I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.)

I quoted the dictionary definition of murder above. Can you point to the part that says governments can't murder?

Where, precisely (and be detailed, with a map) do you think Hamas should be locating itself in Gaza that doesn't have civilians all around them?

You go get a map of Gaza and point it out. I'll wait.

Sorry, but I think actual human beings who lack (affordable or at all!) shelter might just trump a park that was popular in the hippy scene.

If there weren't outstanding legal challenges this would be a no-brainer for me. Fuck the hippies. I'd rather see people sleeping on the streets having options that don't include, you know, sleeping on the streets.

With the outstanding legal challenges, though, I tilt against the university.

You'd think that it would be considered more brutal given that the people committing the killings aren't even exposing themselves to a threat.

Cowards, in a word.

Ugh. This one is a hard one to choose between. In the end, though, given that lawsuits are still in progress, I'm going to have to side against the university for strong-arming while legal actions are still ongoing.

And yet it's the "liberals" who are the whiny snowflakes.🙄