[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago

Maybe one day Congress will do their fucking job and impeach these sycophantic shithead judges.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

but switching to Linux for nearly any business isn’t realistic

Not with that attitude.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

I meant federally protected right to vote, since that’s apples to apples comparison with the second amendment being a federal right. Thus, from a federal point of view, women were not full citizens in many various terms.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

I would happily do so! :)

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Easy solution -- don't use Windows.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Neither am I. MAGA asshats can go screw off. They want to destroy this country. I don’t condone assassination unless truly warranted (talking overt, doubtless genocide as an example), I sure as hell don’t commiserate with MAGA just because of this incident.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What you describe is an interpretation that the courts have laid out, nothing more. And the point I make is that the courts are many times wrong. And in this case, it is wrong. One aspect is that women were not called ~~to~~ (sorry) FROM militia. Yet women are afforded this right today, yes? So a single woman prior to the courts' various opinions over the centuries would not have such a right, since they would not be a part of the militia -- thus, the founders did not intend on it being every person. In fact, women were not even considered full citizens then since they did not possess the right to vote. Then there's the subject of slaves which I have no interest in diving into since that's an even bigger can of worms.

The point is that interpretations is what has won, not original intent. You can hand-wave this as a misconception all you want, but there is logic in it. And that logic is that the Constitution was designed to change over time solely because the founders could not envision the future state of existence, only lay the groundwork for such. Therefore as the second amendment is written, women at minimum should not have this right because, even today, they cannot be drafted -- by your own statements: "the militia: Selective Service. The Draft."

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

And they’re apparently good for hunting the elusive unarmed school children in the middle of class. 30 round mags included!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

If said people are a part of a well-regulated militia, sure. I don’t know of many who are…oh wait, I know of none because militias in the terms the founders would define don’t exist anymore. The closest thing is the National Guard.

But yeah, whatever the courts say is always right and never wrong. So militias are all people, corporations are people, and a collection of cells are people. But veterans coming home from war? Nope, get a job slackers. Can’t afford a home? Live on the streets, slackers. Oh homelessness is illegal now? Time for prison, slackers.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Save your money, invest what money you can, and keep in as good a shape as you can.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Or much more likely…the shooter simply missed. But sure let’s give credit to the imaginary grandpa.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

I definitely don't want him to be a martyr or be able to play like a martyr. But I won't shed one tear when the moment happens.

Every one in the political sphere, including Biden, and the international sphere is giving him such support... I wonder if he'd do the same if it were Biden instead.

12
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

ulkesh

joined 1 year ago