webghost0101

Nothing wrong with learning that doing things should not always require material compensation. I never met an adult who was confused by the concept of getting paid.

I met plenty who are baffled that anyone would do something out of kindness and free. Even hobbies are often talked like i should be trying to monetize my work.

We need more hackers to liberate owned hardware

I find myself in agreement with your perspective although my own perspective is very different.

I have naturally shy’d away from existing philosophical literature and influences because i felt they stopped me from coming up with answers myself. Just like you i find great joy in exploring solutions to mystery.

I have been exploring the concepts of my concious and the reality i find in a very to me organized and structured (autistic) way but as i side effects i have my own interpretation of concepts like what is “information” (the relation between more then a single something )

While i find my concepts often don't translate well in language compared with conventional knowledge its critical to note that as i am reading up more as a matured person I find it adds to my personal understanding rather then contradicting it.

I received a lot of knowledge from playing the outer wilds and things like the dual slit experiment but i assure you i don't take games literally and most knowledge gaining is connecting pre existing dots in my head after being inspired.

There is a good reason why my comment may seem mystifying,

Part is rooted in an observation i made that objective truth can never be fully known. But hear me out.

All our observations are made trough a subjective lens is too easy of an argument i also have a historical example to illustrate.

The plague mask and outfit used flowers because knowledged people at the time thought the sick was in the smell. We know this is not true but the general idea was close enough and it did have a noticeable benefitial effect.

The breakthrough is also important in the chain that lead to further knowledge later on.

The science was incorrect but also good enough to be useful.

In the same pattern we believe we understand most materials but a more advanced future scientist could know things that leaves us no better then the plague doctors in general.

I made an important secondary conclusion based on experience.

There is no benefit to be gained by dismissing the most reasonable incorrect knowledge when there is no reasonable “more correct” interpretation to be found.

I am still not convinced these translate my thoughts well but what this second part odoes is solve the mystic sentiment you mention.

We should strive to find solutions to the unknown because we know there is useful knowledge to be gained.

We should apply the reasonable knowledge we find to better our understanding and lives.

But what we should also do and this is the sentiment i am personally worried about is keep looking beyond our understanding and keep trying to challenge what we do know.

What i initially found when exploring quantum mechanics is that early ideas where dismissed because they challenged what we thought we knew well and thats a line of thinking i find personally shocking when coming for i scientist. I salivate when reality breaks my initial understanding of reality because its such an opportunist. Finding out just how wrong you are is a major step to get more correct.

I do have additional personal bias because of my differences in interpretation. I cant be put it more fairly then this “i experience some kind of dogma about established knowledge when i present my own interpretation of often the same concept, which worries me for our ability to evolve our understanding of the concept” This happens frequently so i experience a surplus of dogmatic scientific arguments around me. Even if they may not be as dogmatic if new knowledge was present in a compatible interpretation.

I hope this clarified my posts a bit, thanks for the detailed reply.

Are they though?

If not satire I think they are fully aware they are crackpot, hence why it sounds like sarcasm.

Some kind of belief in absurdism? Like a “i 100% know this doesn't make sense and i don't care cause neither do you make sense and were both close enough to stay living” is a vibe i get

I know similar views do exist but i cant actually tell with this guy.

And its been proven that placebos work.

So as long as you define life changing energy as a subtle psychological buff…

Op mentioned not living in the US so this may not be a legal option.

I am not sure about most of these but I remember a European discussion on wether pepperspray should be legal or not.

Considering what i heard i wouldn’t be he was calling the name imagining having sex with them instead.

Oh wait, the guy that frequently jokes about having sex with their own offspring was a different weirdo?

I think these guys are now official in a relationship or something so cant blame for mixing them up.

Trumps the one that did the worst deal of the century and bought twitter right?

This was amazing to read, thanks.

Could it be a pun on perception?

THIS ARTICLE IS GASLIGHTING!

It talks about what Israel should do to keep peace in these ILLEGAL settlements. Basically giving geen light to law enforcement to act beyond borders.

It talks about western nations giving sanctions to settlement leaders.. for violence. Giving credibility to these occupation if they where peacefull.

I am not all that suprised but fuck this is blatant.

I cant find you bio. Could you pm me an invite? Thanks.

I am subscribed to a few anarchist places but most seem rather barren.

Lemmy had been the best fit i found online in general. But even here i find i am still often more radical the average.

It would definitely be interesting to know more People to debate these topics with. I am talking a look at that discord server.

Edit: cant find your bio, may you send me an Invite?