zazo

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

too much simping for one's own wife - may you praise Ishtar more and maybe then she'll bless your wife to take your seed (and not just after a bountiful harvest)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So people can just downvote it instead right? That's literal direct democracy at play - if there's more people that like the bot they'll upvote it and it will have a positive score - saying "just bury your head in the sand if you don't agree with this message" is the reason we're in this political mess in the first place..

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Which is why the bot is not useful - it literally tries to standardize political stances when that's actually impossible.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Being grateful is pretty neat but make sure to reciprocate! - "Suck her clit every morning to thank her for choosing you" 🥰

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

So by your logic everyone that drinks coke is an unethical shill that wants to fuck over workers worldwide and hates their health. This completely disregards people that don't know that drinking it causes any of those things - I don't see how they're to blame for the propaganda machine that coke's ad department is.

Still if you do know about these things (and you seem to do) I sure hope you're boycotting coke or otherwise you would be complicit in all the fucked up shit they get up to.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That gender is at least partially a social construct and even if you have XY chromosomes and you've been brought up as a woman you shouldn't be forced to live as a man in case you do a chromosomal test and it turns out you have XY chromosomes.

Imagine the opposite - you're an XX man with a penis and you've lived as a man your whole life and then you do a random chromosomal test and somebody tells you "you see I know you have a penis and I know you're fine being a man but your chromosomes says you're "female" so we have to chop off your dick and you have to grow titties so you can fit into the binaries we've established because it's too hard for others to believe you're a man"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

XY Gonadal Dysgenesis is a thing - or is her having high T levels fundamentally unfair? in which case why isn't there a T limit for male athletes as well? while we're at it why isn't there a hight limit? or for that matter why doesn't Phelps have all his medals revoked if he has multiple genetic "unfair" advantages compared to most swimmers? why is genetic variation seen as "unfair" in women but "fair" in men?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

“Individuals who do not trigger an alert have their image and biometric data deleted immediately which is irretrievable"

“This is a function that has been built into the software which has been tested independently by the National Physics Laboratory. We would like to reassure the public that the data is irretrievable once deleted.”

Why would a governmental agency responsible for measurements and standards be put in charge of verifying cybersecurity functionality??

Also what about false positives? Do those innocent people get their data stored? And for how long?

There's something extremely unsettling about the police being able to issue an arrest warrant on anyone and then use surveillance to arrest them anywhere. I can hear bootlickers already saying "don't commit crimes and you're fine" but I wonder if they would have used the same argument against the suffragettes...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's good to hear! - still feels weird to take profits from people worse off than you - but if it helps them and stays in the community it doesn't seem like that big a deal

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok let's be pedantic then

The judges had stressed they did not need to say for now whether a genocide had occurred but concluded that some of the acts South Africa complained about, if they were proven, could fall under the United Nations’ Convention on Genocide.

Israel isn't convicted of committing genocide, yet as there's only “a plausible risk of genocide” - and I'm sure the "defense" minister calling for the starvation of all people in Gaza and referring to them as "human animals" will do wonders for Israel's case..

The current ruling is that "Israel must take all measures to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza" - which is an interesting statement to make if the ICJ thought no genocidal acts were happening.

But hey innocent until proven guilty right - I just hope if it does get proven you'll be the first one to start shouting how Israel is committing genocide - the same way you're currently doing the opposite - as that would show your true lack of bias..

view more: ‹ prev next ›